The Number One Reason Free Health Care Won't Work in the US

image
Published: 21 Sep, 2017
2 min read

The subject of health care reform is a battle that has been raging since the 1990s. This issue erupted when the cost of health care began to rise.

Coincidentally, the increase in costs rose around the time Healthcare Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) made their appearance.

The actual format of HMOs -- which were first established in 1929 with Ross-Loos Medical Group in Los Angeles, California -- did not take shape until 1977 when HMO health care plans were established by the Fallon Clinic and Blue Cross Insurance of Massachusetts. These became the originating HMO "plans" most individuals rely on today for their health care coverage.

Types of Health Care Services Available

Various ideas within health care reform have been floating around since 1985. The reason health care reform is so difficult to resolve, in a single word, is "cost."

In many countries of the world, health care is free or offered as a single-payer plan.

In the US, health care is mainly the domain of HMO or HSA (Health Savings Account) plans. Americans receive their health care through insurance providers through their employers or individually purchased.

In order to offer world class health care services, cost plays an important role in quality health care services delivered. Physicians, diagnosticians, surgeons, and others linked to medical care cannot work without being paid for their services.

Plans like Medicare and Medicaid are partially funded through payroll tax deductions, spread out over the lifetime of employment.

In single-payer plans, payments for health care services are managed by a single, central entity. In Germany, Canada, and England, for example, single-payer health care is provided by either the central or provincial governments.

IVP Donate

Why Free Health Care Wouldn't Work in the U.S.

In Canada, England, and Germany, these governments set regulations on the cost of health care services provided by those in the medical industry. In the US, medical costs are dependent upon health care insurance providers.

One of the primary reasons why free health care wouldn't work in the US is its sheer population size.

For example, the population of California is larger than that of Canada. In terms of GDP, California ranks fifth in largest economies, leaving states with smaller populations and economies to manage health care costs via state-licensed insurers.

Conclusion

The reason why free health care wouldn't work in the U.S. relates directly to cost of providing state-of-the-art health care services. Free health care services won't work without a comprehensive plan to pay for medical services and medical providers.

With free health care, costs would be paid through higher taxes on the employed who would pay for their own personal health care needs and that of the indigent.

So until we find a viable solution to our health care woes, patients will have to continue resorting to pawn shops and viaticals to pay their medical bills.

Photo Credit: Andy Dean Photography / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Trump sitting in the oval office with a piece of paper with a cannabis leaf on his desk.
Is Trump About to Outflank Democrats on Cannabis? Progressives Sound the Alarm
As President Donald Trump signals renewed interest in reclassifying cannabis from a Schedule I drug to Schedule III, a policy goal long championed by liberals and libertarians, the reaction among some partisan progressive advocates is not celebration, but concern....
08 Dec, 2025
-
5 min read
Malibu, California.
From the Palisades to Simi Valley, Independent Voters Poised to Decide the Fight to Replace Jacqui Irwin
The coastline that defines California’s mythology begins here. From Malibu’s winding cliffs to the leafy streets of Brentwood and Bel Air, through Topanga Canyon and into the valleys of Calabasas, Agoura Hills, and Thousand Oaks, the 42nd Assembly District holds some of the most photographed, most coveted, and most challenged terrain in the state. ...
10 Dec, 2025
-
6 min read
Ranked choice voting
Ranked Choice for Every Voter? New Bill Would Transform Every Congressional Election by 2030
As voters brace for what is expected to be a chaotic and divisive midterm election cycle, U.S. Representatives Jamie Raskin (Md.), Don Beyer (Va.), and U.S. Senator Peter Welch (Vt.) have re-introduced legislation that would require ranked choice voting (RCV) for all congressional primaries and general elections beginning in 2030....
10 Dec, 2025
-
3 min read