One Thing We Can All Agree On: Gerrymandering Sucks

image
Author: Fair Vote
Published: 15 Sep, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

Everybody hates gerrymandering. That’s the takeaway from a new poll that finds dramatic majorities of Americans in favor of limiting the ability of politicians and partisans to draw their own districts.

The survey – a bipartisan poll conducted by Democratic researcher Celinda Lake and Republican analyst Ashlee Rich Stephenson – found that 71 percent of Americans would like the Supreme Court to define a standard that ends extreme partisan gerrymandering.

This cuts across party lines: 80 percent of Democrats, 68 percent of independents, and 65 percent of Republicans would back action by the Court.

“It’s hard to find bipartisan consensus in America today,” Lake said, presenting the findings at a Washington media conference. “This issue has bipartisan consensus even among partisan voters.”

The Court will soon have it’s chance: Oral arguments in a partisan gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. Whitford, will be heard on October 3.

The Wisconsin maps, drawn by Republican legislators, created such GOP-friendly maps that the party won 60 of 99 State Assembly seats in 2012 even though Democrats won more total votes.

This poll, however, discovered that voters are turned off by partisan map-manipulation, even when it is to the benefit of their side. It found that 73 percent of voters wanted to remove all political bias from redistricting – regardless of whether it cost their party seats.

“Freely choosing their representatives is an issue of deep principle for voters of all political stripes,” said Stephenson, the Republican pollster.

IVP Donate

Lake called this strong support “really surprising” since gerrymandering is a new issue for many people, and often considered esoteric or technical. But she and Stephenson suggested that voters see this as a core issue of electoral fairness, no matter their partisan allegiance.

Strong majorities – 75 percent of Democrats, 81 percent of independents and 61 percent of Republicans -- agreed that “we lose the guaranteed freedom to choose our own leaders when electoral maps are drawn to favor one political party.”

Gerry Hebert and Paul Smith, who will argue the case before the Supreme Court, said that they hope the Court will seriously consider this deep support among Americans for action while deliberating a first-ever constitutional standard to rein in excessive partisan gerrymandering.

“In a case as clear as this, we hope that the court will rise to the occasion,” Smith said, “thereby restoring democracy.”

The poll was conducted on behalf of the Campaign Legal Center, which is helping represent the Wisconsin voters who challenged the maps. The details from the survey can be found here.

Editor's note: This article, written by Dave Daley, originally published on FairVote's blog, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Latest articles

homelessness in California
Clearing Homeless Encampments Is a Band-Aid, Not A Solution
Last July, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order “to address (homeless) encampments” and allocated funding to local governments to clear encampments and connect “those living in them to housing and supportive services.” ...
20 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie and AOC: The Political Alliance No One Saw Coming in 2025
All eyes are on President Donald Trump to see if the US will further insert itself into the escalating military conflict between Israel and Iran. As the two nations continue to attack each other, the debate over US involvement is creating a rift between defense hawks and non-interventionists in the Republican Party....
20 Jun, 2025
-
5 min read
Bottle with a cannabis plant on it.
Is Texas About to Be More Chill on Hemp Than California?
California has just proposed a sweeping new rule to permanently ban intoxicating hemp products — and Texas may soon follow, as Governor Greg Abbott (R) faces a June 22 deadline to sign or veto a similar bill....
19 Jun, 2025
-
4 min read