McCain, Whitehouse to SCOTUS: Partisan Gerrymandering Wastes Votes and Silences Voices

image
Shawn M GriffithsShawn M Griffiths
Published: 06 Sep, 2017
2 min read

US Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) are joining the legal fight against partisan gerrymandering.

McCain and Whitehouse filed a joint amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case, Gill v. Whitford -- the first case in which a federal court ruled electoral districts unconstitutional not on the basis of race, gender, or socioeconomic class, but because of political discrimination.

In this case, the court ruled that Wisconsin legislative districts were so partisan that they violated the voting rights of those outside the Republican Party, the party that currently controls the state legislature and the redistricting process.

Of note, 31 briefs have been filed in Gill v Whitford against extreme partisan gerrymandering.

“Americans do not like gerrymandering,” McCain and Whitehouse write.

“They see its mischief, and absent a legal remedy, their sense of powerlessness and discouragement has increased, deepening the crisis of confidence in our democracy. We share this perspective. From our vantage point, we see wasted votes and silenced voices. We see hidden power. And we see a correctable problem.”

Gill v. Whitford, which is scheduled to be heard on October 3, forces the high court to revisit a 2004 decision in Vieth v. Jubelirerin which the justices ruled that there was no measurable standard the court could use to determine what constitutes "too partisan" in legislative redistricting.

Without established Supreme Court precedent, federal courts have been reluctant to take up gerrymandering cases that don't deal with racial or socioeconomic discrimination.

IVP Donate

"The increase in partisan gerrymandering following Vieth, fueled by dark money contributions and advanced technology, distorts our representative democracy and pollutes Americans’ faith in their political institutions,” McCain and Whitehouse write.

They add, “As Republicans and Democrats battle each other to control redistricting, the real losers are the American people.”

The situation, however, has changed as plaintiffs and redistricting reformers are using statistical models like the efficiency gap to establish a measurable standard to show how extreme partisan gerrymandering has become.

Gill v. Whitford has changed the legal and judicial paradigm, potentially opening the door for future challenges to partisan gerrymandering across the country, and an end to the two-party scheme.

Read McCain and Whitehouse's full amicus brief:

Photo Credit: Christopher Halloran / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
The Republican Party of Texas (RPT) is suing Secretary of State Jane Nelson in an effort to close the state’s primary elections to party members only – a move that the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) tried back in 2013 in its state and failed. ...
05 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Retired Attorney Takes Voting Rights Case All the Way to the Supreme Court -- By Himself
The next big voting rights case the Supreme Court of the United States could consider wasn’t filed by the ACLU, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or another household name when it comes to voter rights. ...
09 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read