Santa Fe Voters Sue City Officials to Get Ranked Choice Voting

Santa Fe Voters Sue City Officials to Get Ranked Choice Voting
Published: 01 Sep, 2017
3 min read

Santa Fe voters took action by filing a lawsuit asking the state Supreme Court of New Mexico to order the use of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Santa Fe’s municipal elections next March. FairVote New Mexico strongly supports this legal action.

This lawsuit was not our first choice. We would have preferred -- and still would prefer -- to have the city council uphold the city charter and institute RCV as voters have overwhelmingly supported.

Indeed, it was nine years ago that a resounding majority of Santa Fe’s voters -- 65 percent -- backed a charter amendment that required all candidates for municipal office be elected with majority support via Ranked Choice Voting. The charter specifies that RCV must go into effect as soon as the proper equipment and software becomes available at a reasonable price.

That time has arrived: The software is now available at no cost to Santa Fe, and will be included on the state-certified voting machines that will be used in the city’s March elections.

The city council, however, has voted to delay implementation, which necessitates action.

Santa Fe voters have waited long enough. The conditions necessary to implement Ranked Choice Voting for Santa Fe’s city elections in March have been fully met.

In addition, there is ample time to test the software and educate voters on the new voting system. The Ranked Choice Voting Resource Center stands ready to provide sample materials, best practices, and consultation at no cost, and FairVote New Mexico, in collaboration with several local organizations are ready to implement its comprehensive voter education campaign.

We have tried to convince city councilors to follow the charter. Now it is time for a different path. We are simply asking that the state Supreme Court order the city to meet its obligation -- both legal and moral -- under the city charter and enact the better elections that a decisive majority have demanded.

The will of the voters is that their mayor, city councilors and other city officials win by a majority. Ranked Choice Voting makes that possible -- while providing voters with more choices, a stronger voice at the polls, and better campaigns.

IVP Donate

There can be no greater public interest than ensuring that the voters’ decision be honored, respected -- and implemented.

We are fortunate to be represented by Santa Fe attorney Teresa Leger de Fernandez. She is expanding on 26 years as General Counsel to several Native American Tribes, as well as work with national and local civil rights and economic development organizations.

Since 2010, Leger de Fernandez has successfully brought up the voting rights act in redistricting cases to make voting more fair for Native Americans every time the issue of redistricting has come up.

President Obama appointed Fernandez to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and then elevated her to Vice Chair of the Council. She also served as the Vice President of MALDEF (the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund).

Read the lawsuit:

Editor's note: This article, written by Maria Perez, originally published on FairVote's blog, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Photo Credit: vepar5 / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read