Threats and Intimidation? Inside the Lawsuit Against Colorado Sec. of State

image
Published: 24 Aug, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

Last week, two of Colorado’s presidential electors, the people who cast Colorado’s votes in the electoral college, filed a lawsuit against their Secretary of State, Wayne Williams, alleging that he “threatened and intimidated” them into voting for Secretary Hillary Clinton in December 2016.

Colorado, like many states, has a law that requires its electors to vote for the presidential and vice-presidential candidates who received the most votes in the state during the general election. However, there was a movement across the country following last November’s election to try to prevent Donald Trump from getting the necessary 270 electoral votes to be named president by voting for a third candidate who would take votes away from both Clinton and also Trump.

The movement gained traction in Colorado, and a number of electors decided to vote for John Kasich for president, instead of the state’s general election winner, Hillary Clinton. One of those electors, now a plaintiff in the lawsuit, emailed Secretary of State Williams and asked what would happen if he voted for someone other than Clinton. Williams replied that the elector would be removed from his office and replaced until all of the elector spots were filled with those who would vote according to the state’s election results.

Williams had also stated at some point following the email that any elector not voting for Clinton would be subject to misdemeanor or felony perjury charges. Therefore, the two plaintiffs preemptively filed for an injunction to be able to vote their conscience so as to protect themselves from removal or criminal charges. The court refused to grant the injunction.

On the day electors gathered to cast their votes, two instances occurred which plaintiffs say amount to threats and intimidation. First, the Secretary of State forced the electors to take an oath that was written minutes prior to the meeting and which included them swearing to vote for the person who won the general election, over objections from the Plaintiffs. Additionally, Williams told the press prior to the vote that anyone violating the terms of the oath could be subject to felony perjury charges.

Following this, Michael Baca (who is not a plaintiff), cast his vote for Kasich and was immediately removed from his post as elector, disregarded his vote, and recommended the Colorado Attorney General investigate whether he had committed criminal acts, an investigation which is still open.

The lawsuit, which was filed by nationally-renowned law professor Lawrence Lessig, alleges that Baca’s release and Williams statements to the press amount to threats and intimidation. The suit asks for the Colorado statute that requires electors to vote in line with the general election results unconstitutional.

Latest articles

Marijuana plant.
Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political
For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades....
30 Jun, 2025
-
2 min read
Donald Trump standing behind presidential podium and in front of two American flags.
Has Trump Made His Case for the Nobel Peace Prize?
A news item in recent days that was overshadowed in the media by SCOTUS and the One Big Beautiful Budget Bill was a US-brokered peace agreement that was signed between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – which if it holds will end a conflict between the two countries that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands of people....
30 Jun, 2025
-
7 min read
Picture of skyscraper in New York behind a bridge.
Knives Come Out Against Reform at NYC CRC Hearing as Independents Rise
Last week in Staten Island, the NYC Charter Revision Commission held its next-to-last public hearing. As Commissioner Diane Savino commented, addressing NYC's closed primary system “is the single biggest issue we’ve heard this year.”...
30 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read