Gerrymandering: Everything You Need to Know in 60 Seconds

end gerrymandering button
Image generated by IVN staff.
Shawn M GriffithsShawn M Griffiths
Published: 31 May, 2017
2 min read

There are several ways the Republican and Democratic Parties manipulate the vote and control elections. They control the narrative, who gets to vote in primary elections, and redraw electoral districts to their favor.

The last point is the subject of a recent video put out by GOOD Magazine. The video explains gerrymandering for viewers in 60 seconds. One of the most important takeaways about gerrymandering: it's legal.

That's right. For decades the Republican and Democratic Parties have manipulated electoral districts, diluted the voting power of the political minority, and disenfranchised millions of voters, and the courts have let it slide as long as the parties can show they did not discriminate against voters based on race.

'Two Parties, One Winner' Shouldn't Override 'One Person, One Vote'

It was not until 2016 that the first federal court ruled electoral districts in a state were so partisan that it constituted a gerrymander. The case? Gill v. Whitford out of Wisconsin, and it is currently on deck before the Supreme Court. It's a case you should know about. Here's why:

  • Gill v. Whitford is the first time the courts have ruled that partisan gerrymandering was so extreme that it violated voting rights.
  • The case also has the potential for establishing a baseline for the courts to make future rulings on the issue, striking a blow to the two-party scheme.
  • The Supreme Court has historically shied away from cases like this, ruling in 2004 that it has no measurable or judicial standard to determine what constitutes "too partisan" when lawmakers redraw electoral districts. This could change all of that. (Vieth v. Jubelirer)
  • The Supreme Court will consider a request from Wisconsin officials on Thursday, June 8, to put a stay on a lower court's ruling that state lawmakers redraw their electoral maps by the fall.

Gerrymandering isn't the only scheme the parties use to control elections, but it has ensured that over 90 percent of elections are safe for one party or the other, while violating the voting rights of millions of voters.

In this article

You Might Also Like

broken california map
EXCLUSIVE: California Commissioner Says Lawmakers Gutted Their Funding BEFORE Prop 50
The fate of California’s independently drawn congressional districts will be decided on November 4, when voters weigh in on a legislative gerrymander and the suspension of the state’s independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC) under Proposition 50....
08 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
CA flag and American flag.
New Poll: 54% of Voters Buying What Dems are Selling on California Prop 50
As early voting for the November 4 special election in California begins, a new poll shows a majority of voters may end up supporting Prop 50, which suspends the state's independent redistricting commission in favor of a legislative gerrymander....
07 Oct, 2025
-
2 min read
Nevada Dems Block Independent Redistricting from Going before Voters – Again!
Nevada Dems Block Independent Redistricting from Going before Voters – Again!
With deep frustration, Vote Nevada PAC announced it is withdrawing its ballot initiative to create an independent redistricting commission -- a proposal meant to bring openness, accountability, and fairness to how Nevada’s political maps are drawn....
03 Oct, 2025
-
5 min read
Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read