Maine Supreme Court Says Ranked Choice Voting Does Not Comply with State Constitution

image
Published: 23 May, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

The Maine Supreme Court released its advisory opinion on the constitutionality of ranked choice voting Tuesday. On the question of whether or not the alternative voting method violates the plurality clause in the Maine Constitution, the justices ruled in the affirmative.

Further, the justices ruled that since ranked choice voting was adopted through statute, rather than a constitutional amendment, the conflict between the statute and the language of the constitution presents a solemn occasion to give their advisory opinion.

Here are some of the facts:

  • Maine state law currently says that candidates only need to get a plurality of the vote to win an election. The justices ruled that since ranked choice voting requires plurality winners to go through additional runoffs in the election, the alternative voting method is in conflict with the language of the Maine Constitution.
  • This is an advisory opinion and is not binding legal precedent.
  • Maine has one of the oldest direct democracy initiative processes in the country.
  • The majority of Maine voters passed ranked choice voting in 2016 under Question 5, over opposition from Republican and Democratic leaders.
  • Maine's effort to implement ranked choice voting is viewed by many election reform experts as one of the most significant accomplishments in nonpartisan election reform. It fundamentally changed the way elections are conducted, providing voters a pathway for third party and independent candidates to be elected.

"This ruling by the Maine court is testament to the institutional hurdles that have been erected by the two major parties to insulate themselves from true competition," says Independent Voter Project attorney Chad Peace. "Democrats that believe in Democracy should be concerned. Republicans that believe in representation should be paying closer attention. Everyone, regardless  of their party, should be thinking about how our elections are conducted, and connecting that conduct to the quality of our representation.”

Read IVN's past coverage of RCV Maine:

Maine Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on Ranked Choice Voting

Maine RCV Defense: Politicians Try to Undermine the People’s Rights

Underhanded! Maine Politicians Sneaky Move to Undermine Ranked Choice Voting

Ranked Choice Voting Advocates Celebrate Historic Victory in Maine

IVP Donate

Read the court's opinion:

 

Latest articles

prison fence
Californians Just Voted to Get Tough on Crime. So Why Is Newsom Closing Another Prison?
Less than a year after 10 million Californians voted to lengthen prison sentences and crack down on retail theft and fentanyl dealing, Governor Gavin Newsom is shutting down yet another state prison....
08 Aug, 2025
-
4 min read
Gavin Newsom
California's Governor is Not Just Messing With Texas
It is a classic political threat. Take one more step, and I will act. But this time, even though the target is Texas Republicans, it could easily turn out that California Democrats wind up taking the fall....
08 Aug, 2025
-
3 min read
Gerrymandering, Primaries, and Election History: How It Really Works
Gerrymandering, Primaries, and Election History: How It Really Works
The nation’s attention is currently on the ongoing redistricting fight between Republicans and Democrats. The conversation is being framed: “Donald Trump is doing this.” “Gavin Newsom is doing that.” However, what voters are missing is the context of how we got here....
08 Aug, 2025
-
1 min read