OPINION: The Sad and Twisted State of Justice on US College Campuses

image
Published: 22 May, 2017
Updated: 17 Oct, 2022
2 min read

Since roughly the 1980s, certain norms on US college campuses have shifted dramatically. In cases of sexual harassment or sexual assault, the administrative default has swung from precautionary skepticism to, in a word, gullibility. Administrative policy is now being led by a contingent of activists for whom it is anathema to question the word of any self-proclaimed victim. Everyone is guilty until proven innocent.

The Duke Lacrosse case, and the ensuing humiliation of Rolling Stone, should have been enough to extinguish this line of reasoning. It wasn't. The new norms, fed both by political will and by confirmation bias from real crimes, have prevailed. To push back, we have to go back to underlying principles.

Why Defend Defendants?

Private college campuses, like any other private entity in our society, have considerable latitude to police themselves as they see fit. Some left-wing, liberal-arts schools may have student regulations that seem like they fell out of 1793 Paris, but none of the students were forced to attend those schools. This is a matter of law; but there is also the matter of culture.

While the mandate of the US Constitution is to our Federal Government, its principles have survived the test of time because they are fundamental values for any civilized society. The Constitution protects our right to free speech and assembly and personal defense from government overreach, but the rationale for that protection is that these are bedrock necessities, and ought to be protected from all challenges.

The same is true for Amendments IV-VIII. Indeed, it is worth noting that fully half of the original Bill of Rights was devoted to protecting the defendants in criminal cases. This was not an accident; our Founding Fathers were all too aware that spurious police actions were the likely tool of choice for petty tyrants.

Why We Should Care

As De Tocqueville noted at the time, while we cannot construct a perfect system of justice, we can hope to construct a system of justice that resists being used as a political tool. One way to do that is to ensure that people are innocent until proven guilty: that the system defaults to not exercising its awesome punitive powers. College campuses would do well to study that lesson. Once your on-campus system of justice is politicized, guilt and innocence are simply a matter of who is in charge. And that can change.

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read