CA Lawmakers Advance Presidential Primary Bill That Doesn't Fix Anything

image
Created: 12 May, 2017
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
1 min read

This week, AB 837 passed the California Assembly Appropriations Committee. The bill requires polling places across the state to put up giant posters during presidential primaries that inform independent voters (registered as No Party Preference) on which parties allow them to participate in "their" primary.

On Wednesday, April 26, representatives from the Independent Voter Project (a co-publisher of IVN) went to Sacramento to voice their opposition to the bill. While the Independent Voter Project strongly encourages voter education opportunities, this bill -- introduced by Assemblymember Evan Low and supported by Secretary of State Alex Padilla -- doesn't solve any problems with the presidential primary in California. The semi-closed system in place is not only cumbersome and confusing to many voters, it contradicts Article II, Section 5 of the state constitution, which explicitly says there must be an open presidential primary.

The Independent Voter Project argues that AB 837 is just providing cover for the establishment and doesn't actually try to make the system better for voters.

READ MORE: Independent Voter Project Opposes Ineffective Presidential Primary Bill

In 2016, the Independent Voter Project worked with members of the California legislature to draft a resolution that urged the secretary of state to provide a nonpartisan ballot option for the presidential primaries. On this ballot, NPP voters would be able to vote for the candidate of their choice, regardless of that candidate’s party affiliation.

ACR 145 did not require political parties to take the results of the nonpartisan ballot into consideration, thereby maintaining both the parties’ right to not associate with non-members and the voters’ fundamental right to participate at all meaningful stages of an election.

The resolution died in committee, but the Independent Voter Project continues to call on state lawmakers and the state's chief elections administrator (Padilla) to bring California’s elections in line with the state constitution.

Photo Credit: Victoria Lipov / shutterstock.com

Latest articles

People using their phones.
How Digital Echo Chambers Hijacked Political Discourse — And What That Means for Independent Voters
In a time when technology moves faster than public awareness can keep up, the line between communication and manipulation is vague. A recent piece in Tablet Magazine titled “Rapid-Onset Political Enlightenment” sheds light on how the digital era — once hailed as a democratizing force — has been weaponized to manufacture consent, manage narratives, and in many cases, replace political discussion with political echo chambers....
21 Mar, 2025
-
3 min read
Stack of ballots on American flag.
Defining the Democracy Movement: Andy Moore and the National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers
The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. ...
20 Mar, 2025
-
4 min read
an i voted sticker peeled up.
Louisiana Voters Are Not Happy About the State's Move to Closed Primaries
Closed primaries are coming to Louisiana in 2026, but a new poll shows that state voters across the political spectrum overwhelmingly favor open primaries where any voter can vote for any candidate running for office....
19 Mar, 2025
-
3 min read