logo

Colorado One Step Closer to Implementing Open Primaries

image
Created: 09 May, 2017
Updated: 17 October, 2022
2 min read

On Monday, the Colorado State Senate approved SB 305, a bill that guides the secretary of state on how to write the rules for the state's open primary system, approved by voters under Proposition 108 in November 2016.

Proposition 108, campaigned for by Let Colorado Vote and supported by Gov. John Hickenlooper, allows unaffiliated voters to participate on the party ballot of their choice during primary elections. Prior to its passage, Colorado used closed primary elections for all races, except president, which utilized a caucus system until voters reformed that as well under Proposition 107.

Now, all elections have a primary system that allows independent voters to participate.

However, as closing day to the current legislative session nears, debate among lawmakers about how to implement open primaries has gotten heated -- particularly over one provision included in the bill. The provision would instruct county clerks to make a record of which party independent voters participate in and then send the voter the same party's ballot each election that followed unless explicitly directed by the voter to do otherwise.

Supporters of the provision, including SB 305 sponsor Kevin Lundberg, say it is about election integrity and transparency:

"We need to know who votes in every election we conduct. And that’s a public record right now — and we haven’t changed that — and that has to be the case if there’s ever going to be a proper election audit or an election recount — and there will be audits and recounts, because elections are close and elections aren’t perfect," said Lundberg.

Some election officials, particularly in Denver and Arapahoe, have suggested that keeping a specific record of which primary ballot independent voters vote on wouldn't be necessary to administer and audit an election. Opponents of the provision claim it forces independent voters into de facto affiliation with a party, and even ran ads blasting the proposal.

In the end, Lundberg and fellow sponsor Steve Fenberg introduced an amendment that removed the provision from the bill, which was soon followed by a floor vote. The bill passed 30-5, sending SB 305 to the State House and one step closer to Gov. Hickenlooper's desk.

Photo Credit: Vepar5 / shutterstock.com

IVP Existence Banner

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read