Blackmail, Unmasking, and Partisan Politics: The Flynn Case Continues on Capitol Hill

image
Published: 09 May, 2017
2 min read

As expected, this hearing was sharply divided among political lines.

There were certainly a few moments and takeaways that stood out from the Capitol Hill testimony of Sally Yates and James Clapper concerning Russian influence in the November election.

  • Sally Yates made the point, and an effective one, that due to his relationships with Russian officials, Michael Flynn was susceptible to blackmail from the Russians. During her testimony, Yates said she warned the White House about Flynn in two meetings with White House Counsel Don McGahn. Michael Flynn was dismissed some 18 days later.
  • An “independent investigation” of this issue will likely be proffered and used as a political weapon for Democrats. The goal is to make this a campaign issue for 2018 and 2020 -- much like Rep. Darrell Issa made investigations his priority during the Obama administration.
  • Senator Chuck Grassley asked James Clapper and Yates if either of them viewed classified documents where Mr. Trump, his associates, and members of Congress had been unmasked. They each replied Yes, but said they didn’t share that information with the media.
  • There was no confirmation of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian associates and there has not been any evidence that Russia changed a vote on election day.
  • Lindsey Graham pressed Mr. Clapper and Sally Yates about who unmasked Michael Flynn to the Washington Post, perhaps paving the way for a Susan Rice subpoena.
  • Senator Ted Cruz sparred with Yates over her decision to defy President Trump’s immigration executive order that led to her firing. Yates stated the order was “unconstitutional” and could not in good conscience send her attorneys into a courtroom to defend the order.

Where do we go from here? Likely the announcement of an “independent investigation” is coming. We will also likely hear the push for Susan Rice to testify before a congressional or senatorial committee regarding the unmasking of Trump associates and surveillance issues. Senator Lindsey Graham also noted that there will be a classified meeting between the committee members and at least Yates and Clapper, where questions that were not answered in this hearing, will be answered behind closed doors.

Photo Credit: REUTERS/AARON P. BERNSTEIN

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read