Judge: Ballot Access Barrier in Montana Special Election is Unconstitutional

image
Published: 12 Apr, 2017
1 min read

Independent and minor party candidates in Montana were handed a bittersweet victory in their bids to replace former Congressman Ryan Zinke.

On April 8, Federal Judge Brian Morris ruled against Montana Secretary of State Cory Stapleton, finding that the signature requirement placed on non-major party candidates "severely burdens the constitutional rights of ballot access for independent candidates and minor party candidates."

Green Party nominee Thomas Breck, independent candidate Steve Kelly, and Green Party voter Danielle Breck sued the secretary of state last month, challenging the state's unreasonably high signature requirement for ballot access in Montana's upcoming special election.

From Judge Morris' decision:

“The Court determines that Montana’s 5 percent signature requirement for a special election severely burdens the constitutional rights of ballot access for independent candidates and minor party candidates. The state’s interest in seeking to impose order on the election process must give way to a candidate’s right to ballot access in light of the truncated timeframe to gather signatures, the prohibitive costs of such a concentrated signature gathering process, and the other unique problems posed by special elections.”

Plaintiffs were granted an injunction which reduced the required signatures from over 14,000 to 400. However, according to the Independent Record, it appears unlikely that Breck and Kelly will appear on the May 25 special election ballot.

Breck, the Green Party's nominee, submitted nearly 600 signatures Monday and has appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. He told KGVO he plans to run as a write-in candidate in any event.

Read Judge Morris' decision:

Photo Credit: Susan Schmitz / Shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read