Headspinning: Sen. Whitehouse Says Wall Street Really Wanted Bernie Sanders to Win Primary

image
Published: 05 Apr, 2017
1 min read

https://twitter.com/TimeForAllofUs/status/849302435873128451

Remember all the love Bernie Sanders showed Wall Street during his campaign? Namely none? Well despite that, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) seems to think that Wall Street was backing Sanders in the 2016 presidential primaries against Secretary Hillary Clinton.

Whitehouse made his assertions on MSNBC’s Morning Joe early Tuesday, much to the disbelief of the show’s host, Joe Scarborough. Scarborough responded by pointing out what a close relationship Secretary Clinton had with Wall Street.

Senator Whitehouse said that while Clinton may have had closer ties to Wall Street than the other Democrats, bankers and investors would have fared better under a Republican president than Hillary Clinton. Therefore, he claims, Wall Street put money behind Sanders, believing him to be the weaker candidate and the one more likely to lose against the Republican nominee.

His only specific claim was that Wall Street spent money in New Hampshire for Sanders. A search for evidence of this provided only Secretary Clinton’s claim that Bernie Sanders had taken $200,000 from Wall Street through the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee (DSCC). FactCheck.org’s investigation of this claim found that while Sanders had received $200,000 from the DSCC, only a small portion of that had come from Wall Street.

Also contrary to his claim are the actual facts. Goldman Sachs' CEO Lloyd Blankfein said Sanders’ anti-Wall Street rhetoric was potentially dangerous. On the other hand, Clinton raised more money from the securities and investment industry than any candidate in either party during the primary season.

While Whitehouse’s statements seem unfounded, some have speculated that his goal was to foster the narrative that Republicans are closely tied to Wall Street and Democrats are on the side of everyone else. However, both parties have longstanding ties to Wall Street, a fact that no morning interview is going to easily overshadow.

Image Source: Crush Rush / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read