Convention Center Expansion Legal Hurdle Cleared

image
Jeff PowersJeff Powers
Published: 26 Jan, 2017
1 min read

San Diego, CALIF.- In a ruling that is not yet final, Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil, stated the Coastal Commission’s approval of a Convention Center expansion along the waterfront was IN compliance with the California Coastal Act and state environmental laws.

Wohlfeil rejected a legal challenge that sought to block such a development on the waterfront.

At issue, whether the California Coastal Commission violated state law when it approved a $520 million bayfront expansion several years ago.

The case was brought by Attorney Cory Briggs. Briggs, along with lawyers for the commission, San Diego Unified Port District and the city, had argued their case in a court hearing last month.

Wohlfeil addressed the legal issues raised by Briggs, including coastal access.

Wohlfeil wrote, “exhaustively addressed the issue of coastal access, and in particular working to make the (bayfront) promenade more inviting. Throughout the process, the commission addressed the need to increase the public recreational experience along the waterfront.”

Briggs is representing the San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition.

San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer praised the decision. Faulconer released a statement that read in part, "Today’s strong ruling is tremendous news for San Diego’s economy and removes one of the biggest hurdles to expanding the convention center. This expansion is all about creating jobs and growing tourism as well as keeping and attracting large conventions like Comic-Con.”

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read