Measures C and D: What Now?

image
Kristen HendersonKristen Henderson
Published: 09 Nov, 2016
2 min read

San Diego, CALIF. - Two of the most highly contested local ballot measures in the City of San Diego were defeated last night, as the voters of San Diego declined to pass Measures C and D.

With 43% voting YES and 57% voting NO, Measure C (the Chargers’ Initiative) fell far short of the 2/3 majority needed to pass. Measure D required a simple majority and  managed to receive 40% of YES votes.

A large number of provisional ballots still need to be counted, and while the numbers will likely fluctuate a bit, the outcomes are not expected to change.

What no on Measures C and D mean:

  • No downtown football stadium
  • No increased hotel-room (TOT) tax
  • No approval for Qualcomm Stadium site to be sold for educational or park use

The cornerstone tenet of Measure D (and by far, the most popular component of either measure) was the development of the Qualcomm Stadium site for parkland and higher education use. Supporters of Measure D say they are still pursuing that goal although in what form is not yet known but clearly, the public has a desire to make sure the Qualcomm Stadium site is used in the capacity Measure D envisioned.

Now to Measure C and the Chargers. What happens next?

Chargers owner Dean Spanos has been outspoken in his reluctance to remain in Mission Valley. Spanos released a statement last night indicating that a decision would not be made until after the season ends. “In terms of what comes next for the Chargers, it’s just too early to give you an answer,” he said.

The team could opt to tear down Qualcomm and build a new stadium in its place, but it’s unlikely given Spanos’ announcement earlier this year that the team has no intention of staying in Mission Valley.

A rewrite for Measure C is possible for 2017. Haney Hong of the San Diego County Taxpayer's Association was quoted recently saying, "I think that folks would love the Chargers to stay but I think they want to make sure it’s done in a deal that's fair to taxpayers.”  

IVP Donate

Taking what they learned from the election defeat, the Chargers could craft a stadium solution more likely to receive voter support.

The Chargers also have the option of becoming a tenant in the Rams’ new stadium in Los Angeles. The team has until January 15, 2017 to decide.

You Might Also Like

Ethan Penner
Could This Well-Funded Independent Upend the CA Governor’s Race?
Ethan Penner, a Calabasas businessman, author, and educator with a storied career in real estate finance, has officially announced his intention to run for California governor in 2026 as an independent. On his campaign website, Penner says he is running to “disrupt the failing two-party system.” ...
12 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
Supreme Court of the United States
Forward Party Joins Petition to SCOTUS Against State of Florida
Right now, the divide between the Republican and Democratic Parties appears beyond repair. The political rhetoric is toxic, the nation’s leadership puts party gain before lasting solutions, and few voters actually feel heard by the people elected to represent them. At a time when it seems things will only get worse from here, the Independent Voter Project filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court along with Open Primaries and the Forward Party in support of a lawsuit that targets one of the biggest culprits behind all of this....
16 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read