Government Could Prosecute Author Trying to Protect American Consumers

image
Carl WicklanderCarl Wicklander
Published: 03 Oct, 2016
2 min read

An author who is attempting to expose security vulnerabilities to consumers could face a lawsuit from the government for his efforts.

Matthew Green, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University Information Security Institute, is writing a book tentatively titled, Practical Cryptographic Engineering. However, in obtaining research data for this project, Green could be violating copyright law. The digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed an order last Thursday against the government to not prosecute Green.

Green's research seeks to expose the weaknesses in computer programs that make them vulnerable to hackers.

However, it also requires that he work directly with computer code which is protected by U.S. copyright law. While normally such research would be classified as "fair use," computer researchers can be penalized for selling such a book. Green's findings have implications for customers' smartphones, ATMs, and other electronic devices.

The EFF first filed lawsuit on Green's behalf in July. Significantly, the EFF challenges the constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The act institutes prohibitions on discussion of copyrighted material. According to Section 1201 of the U.S. Copyright code, it is:

"...illegal to circumvent technological measures used to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works, including copyrighted books, movies, videos, video games, computer programs."

If the lawsuit is successful, the EFF could demonstrate that the DMCA's provisions are violations of the First Amendment.

Green says his work is vital for protecting consumers. Yet companies' self-interest could prevent his and others' research from helping those clients. Green said on his blog in July:

"Companies use the courts to silence researchers who have embarrassing things to say about their products, or who uncover too many of those products' internal details."

The U.S. Justice Department wants the court to dismiss the EFF's lawsuit. Rather, the Justice Department claims Green and the EFF lack the standing to make the suit. They make this charge because to date there has not been a threat of prosecution.

Although if prosecuted, Green and anyone doing research like his face onerous penalties which can include a five-year imprisonment.

IVP Donate

According to EFF attorney Kit Walsh, the research of Professor Matthew Green is an important public service. She says, "If we want our communications and devices to be secure, we need to protect independent security researchers like Dr. Green."

Photo Credit: wk1003mike / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

broken california map
EXCLUSIVE: California Commissioner Says Lawmakers Gutted Their Funding BEFORE Prop 50
The fate of California’s independently drawn congressional districts will be decided on November 4, when voters weigh in on a legislative gerrymander and the suspension of congressional maps from the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC) under Proposition 50....
08 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
fl-let-us-vote
Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Opening Florida’s Primaries to 3.4M Independent Voters
A new statewide poll finds near-unanimous agreement among both Democratic and independent voters that Florida’s primaries should be opened to the state’s 3.4 million “No Party Affiliation” (NPA) voters who are currently shut out of taxpayer-funded elections....
10 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read