Debate Commission Co-Chairs Cross Ethical Line with Political Donations

Debate Commission Co-Chairs Cross Ethical Line with Political Donations
Published: 16 Sep, 2016
2 min read

The Commission on Presidential Debates announced Friday that only Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and their respective running mates will be included in the first presidential debates. The announcement comes less than two weeks before the first debate in New York.

The Commission on Presidential Debates is registered as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization. According to the commission's website, its mission is:

1988199219962000200420082012

Yet, as many are now aware, the commission is led and composed of former leaders and elected officials of the two dominant parties in the United States, the Republican and Democratic parties.

In fact, co-chair Michael McCurry previously served as the director of communications for the Democratic National Committee and was the press secretary for President Bill Clinton. Co-creator and Co-Chair Frank Fahrenkopf served as the chairman of the Republican National Committee from 1983 to 1989.

However, of great interest is not only their political resumes, but the fact that they have and continue to contribute large sums of money to major party organizations and their respective presidential nominees. Fahrenkopf has given tens of thousands of dollars to the RNC and has contributed thousands to Republican nominees, including George W. Bush and John McCain. Source: OpenSecrets.org

Screen Shot 2016-09-15 at 8.16.23 PM

Michael McCurry has a long history of giving money to Hillary Clinton, even donating to her campaign on the day she announced her candidacy on April 12, 2015. Source: OpenSecrets.org

Screen Shot 2016-09-15 at 8.15.42 PM

The donation history of both CPD chairmen, as well as other members of the commission's board, raises obvious ethical concerns and even brings to question whether or not the organization can legally have its 501(c)(3) status.

After all, the stated purpose of the CPD is to educate the public in a nonpartisan manner and conduct quality debates. Yet, it is controlled by people who have both a political and financial investment in the success of the Republican and Democratic parties.

The CPD is not nonpartisan, nor is its criteria for debate entry. It is bipartisan. The American people deserve better.

IVP Donate

Open the debates.

Photo Credit: Jason Reed / Reuters

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read