Sanders and Trump Agree: 15% Debate Threshold Is 'Too High'

image
Published: 05 Sep, 2016
2 min read

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laARZFcAwNw

Making an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday, former Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders told host Chuck Todd that he thinks the current polling threshold to gain entry into the presidential debates is too high.

Todd: Do you think Gary Johnson should be in the debates?Sanders: Generally speaking, my view is that if people reach a certain level -- you can debate about what that level is -- I think it is, what is it? 15 percent. I think they should be in the debates.Todd: You think that mark -- that level -- that 15 percent is a fair metric?Sanders: It's probably too high.Todd: You think it should be lower?Sanders: Probably should be lower.

Sanders didn't explicitly come out and say Johnson should be included in the debates. However, he does believe that the current metric used by the debate commission should be changed. And he is not the only major presidential contender in the 2016 election cycle to say this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8o7jnlJPQGk

In 2000, Donald Trump, now the Republican nominee for president, said the 15 percent threshold was a way for the major parties to say "they don't want anybody trying to knock off the Democrats or Republicans."

"The people who set that rule were Democrats and Republicans. It's ridiculous," he added.

IVN is publishing a series of articles on the methodology of the 5 polls used by the Commission on Presidential Debates. A closer look at the Fox News presidential polls found a drastic under-sampling of independents compared to most polls and CNN doesn't even sample Millennials -- the largest living generation and approximately a third of the electorate.

While Todd asked Sanders if he thinks the threshold is too high, perhaps a better question to ask the independent senator is if he thinks horse-race poling should be used at all. It is a game that well-respected polling organizations like Gallup and Pew Research have ditched. Maybe it is time the CPD follow suit.

 

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read