A Supreme Court Justice Dies; The Nation Now Faces Its Greatest Test at Civility

image
Jaime CasarinJaime Casarin
Published: 13 Feb, 2016
2 min read

Today, February 2, 2016, a United States Supreme Court justice appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 died at the age of 79, Antonin Scalia. The governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, issued a statement that confirmed the recent news where he praised him for his work in the Supreme Court.

While it is time to be sympathetic and offer our condolences, support, and prayers, the Supreme Court does not have the luxury of contemplating the loss indefinitely and must go on as seamless as possible. It simply cannot function with one of its members missing.

The reason there are 9 justices on the Supreme Court is because there can never be a tie. A real test for civility in the process is yet to come while campaigns for primary elections are in full force and a presidential election is underway.

There is relatively good news for both Democrats and Republicans, which might translate into bad news for the rest of us. The good news for Democrats is that the acting President of the United States gets to appoint the next justice, while the good news for Republicans is that the Senate gets to confirm the president's nomination. With a Democrat in the Oval Office and a Republican majority in the Senate, we might see the most gruesome battle yet.

The confirmation process will take center stage as the nation and the world will watch with meticulous focus, as many have come to realize the importance of the Supreme Court throughout the ages. Voters, citizens, residents, those living within our borders, and the rest of the world have seen the potential of a metamorphosis, where the United States takes wide turns at all sides of the political spectrum.

Rightfully so and regardless of where one stands politically, the country will need to respectfully mourn Justice Scalia's death because one of us has died, a very important person that was part of an important institution of our government. Without a doubt, his interpretation of the law was more than a mere opinion. It was 11.11 percent of what we would potentially hold as the standard as a country.

One of the greatest events in history and civics of the United States of America is about to start, with consequences and repercussion for years to come.

You Might Also Like

Independent Indiana Challenges the Two-Party Stranglehold on State Politics
Independent Indiana Challenges the Two-Party Stranglehold on State Politics
A new nonpartisan group launched this week in Indiana with a single goal in mind: Take on Indiana’s entrenched two-party system by encouraging more candidates to give voters a third option free of a party label -- and calling Hoosiers to support these candidates. ...
04 Sep, 2025
-
4 min read
Colorado mail ballot
“Gold-Standard” or “Rigged”? How Secure Colorado’s Mail-In Elections Really Are
The White House touted a big announcement Tuesday, only for it to be reported early that President Donald Trump plans to re-locate U.S. Space Command headquarters from Colorado to Alabama – which is not as big of deal as the reason for the decision....
03 Sep, 2025
-
6 min read
two hands shaking.
California Doubles Down on Rehabilitation
On a hot August morning, state and local leaders gathered in Fresno to cut the ribbon on California’s newest community reentry facility. The site, run in partnership with TURN Behavioral Health Services, is designed to help people finishing prison sentences adjust to life on the outside. For Jorge Moreno of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), it’s about giving people a chance to breathe. “(It’s) like a phase down from the institutions,” he said. “(They) can decompress from the pressures and politics of prison and start acclimating back into the community.”...
03 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read