Supporters of Reforming POTUS Debates Propose National Primary to Choose Independent Candidate

Supporters of Reforming POTUS Debates Propose National Primary to Choose Independent Candidate
Published: 14 Jul, 2015
1 min read

Appearing on C-SPAN's Washington Journal on Tuesday morning, James K. Glassman - one of the 50 signers of the Change the Rule letter asking the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) to open the stage to an independent candidate in the fall of 2016 - raised a fascinating idea for selecting that candidate.

The idea is a month-long national independent primary campaign, to take place next spring. Details are not set, but Glassman said that some members of the commission itself are discussing the notion. It could work this way: Candidates qualify for the independent primary by gathering enough signatures to get on the ballot in states constituting at least 270 electoral votes (a qualification the CPD has now).

The candidates who clear that bar - let's just guess that there are a half-dozen - will then appear in a series of debates, culminating in an online national primary election. The winner will be the independent, or third-party, representative on the stage in the general election debates. Glassman called this an "exciting idea," almost certain to generate enthusiasm for an alternative to the current duopoly, enforced by the CPD.

He also noted that the most recent NBC-Wall Street Journal poll found that nearly as many American voters call themselves "independents" as the combined number identifying as Democrats and Republicans: 45% independents vs. 47% Ds plus Rs.

Americans want an independent choice. That was clear from Glassman's 40-minute appearance on the C-SPAN morning call-in show, which elicited nearly unanimous support for the concept of opening the presidential debates to a third participant.

You can watch it here.

Editor's note: This article originally published on Presidential Debate News on July 8, 2015, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Photo Credit: Svanblar / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read