Don't Let a Crisis go to Waste: Presidential Contenders Weigh In on Baltimore Riots

image
Published: 30 Apr, 2015
2 min read
Another month goes by and another black man has died at the hands of the police -- almost as if the clock that counts the days since the last killing of an unarmed minority in America went back to zero. Naturally, political networks and pundits could not wait to weigh in on how the riots in Baltimore are a prime example that reinforces their world view.

While both candidates condemned the riots and violence that have gripped the city in recent days, Hilary Clinton and Rand Paul had distinctively different approaches to the problem.

Rand Paul was first up to bat when he made an appearance on the Laura Ingraham Show. Instead of the militarization of the police or the racial inequality of the justice system, a subject that Paul has previously acknowledged, the Kentucky senator decided to pull the family values card out of the Pat Buchanan playbook.

"There are so many things we can talk about: the breakdown of the family structure, the lack of fathers, the lack of a moral code in our society." - U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.)

No racism here -- just fatherless youths who are breaking the law. This comes in spite of recent evidence of non-fatherless youths exhibiting unlawful behavior. But I digress.

Next up was Hillary Clinton, who used her time at a recent Colombia University panel to comment on the recent events in Baltimore. The former senator and secretary of state started her speech with a direct challenge to the perception that we are in a post-racial era.

"We have to come to terms with some hard truths about race and justice in America." - Hillary Clinton

Clinton's speech ran down a list of deaths that have dominated the American news cycle, while also drawing attention to the racial inequity of the justice system in many communities:

"There is something profoundly wrong when African American men are still far more likely to be stopped and searched by police, charged with crimes, and sentenced to longer prison terms than are meted out to their white counterparts."

Whether you agree with these statements or not, the fact that these conversations are happening at the presidential candidate level instead of email threads with your racist uncle are a sign of progress. America does need to recognize that we do have a problem that we can not push under the rug any longer.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read