logo

Mandatory Vaccinations vs. Personal Choice: The Debate Heats Up in Sacramento

image
Tige RichardsonTige Richardson
Published: 23 Apr, 2015
1 min read

SACRAMENTO, CALIF. -- A new bill that would require more children to be vaccinated before they enter California schools passed through the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday. The bill has sparked the ire of many anti-vaccination organizations that span the idealogical spectrum.

Senate Bill 277 was authored by Senator Ben Allen from Santa Monica and former pediatrician turned State Senator, Dr. Richard Pan. The statute would limit exemptions from vaccinations to just medical reasons, eliminating exemptions for religious and personal reasons.

Opposition to the bill includes groups who say the bill violates religious freedoms. When an amendment was offered to include religious exemption, Senator Pan rejected it. Spokeswoman Shannan Martinez addressed the religious amendment in a statement to the Los Angeles Times:

"Religious exemptions are vulnerable to abuse and indeed are abused by people whose reasons for not vaccinating are not religious.”

With many committee and floor votes still ahead, the debate is sure to continue.

Read the full article here.

Image: California State Senator Richard Pan (D-Sacramento)

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read