Change In U.S.-Cuba Relations Not Likely to Include Guantanamo Bay

image
Created: 29 Dec, 2014
Updated: 15 Oct, 2022
2 min read
More than a week has passed since President Obama's big

announcement that the United States is going to move toward more normalized relations with Cuba. The reactions to the policy shift have varied as speculation continues over what all it will mean for the U.S.

The reported normalization would ease travel restrictions and banking ties as well as economic transactions up to a certain point. However, initial acts from the government indicate that one of the more notorious American connections to the island is unlikely to change.

The U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, located on the southeastern tip of the island, has been leased to the United States since 1903. The Communist government of Cuba has protested the presence of the base and has refused payment from the U.S. The Guantanamo Bay detention center was the site of many of the controversial interrogation techniques that led many Americans to support its closure.

Obama stirred much reaction in 2009 when one of his first acts as president was to sign an executive order to close the prison within one year. Congress prevented its closure and the administration's refusal to take a stronger stand has disappointed many of Obama's supporters.

Closure or transfer of the controversial center was not included among the prospective policy changes to come with the easing of relations with Cuba. During negotiations, the U.S. refused to return the land to Cuba and it is unclear whether any changes regarding the center will occur.

Veteran national security correspondent Mark Thompson reports that, according to a one-time commander of US Southern Command, the status of the prison has little effect of US stewardship of the base:

"Absent a detention facility and even following the eventual demise of the Castro regime . . . the strategic capability provided by US Naval Station Guantanamo remains essential for executing national priorities throughout the Caribbean, Latin America and South America."

On the other side, Lawrence Korb, a former Pentagon official during the Reagan administration, told Military.com that the base is altogether more trouble than it is worth, saying, "It's caused us a lot of problems. It was a way for us to get around US laws and traditions."

Last week, President Obama pledged to do everything he could do to close it because "it is something that continues to inspire jihadists and extremists around the world." The president's TV appearance coincided with the transfer of four prisoners from Guantanamo Bay to Afghanistan. It may be a possible sign that the White House is genuinely looking to close the detention facility, although the released detainees were considered low-level threats.

Another factor likely to complicate matters with the base is that as of November 2014, there were still 36 detainees held there despite no evidence against them. The administration also continues other controversial tactics as extraordinary rendition and drone strikes.

More Choice for San Diego

Congress still has to vote to lift the trade embargo, but past movement on the Guantanamo Bay detention center indicates that any reform may come slowly.

Latest articles

Man voting.
Maine Lawmakers Vote to Protect RCV Counting Process, Which Generates Results in 'One Minute'
On Monday, Maine's Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee voted 3-7 against restoring batch elimination to the ranked choice voting (RCV) system through LD 656 (HP 424), the title of which claims it will save taxpayers money, but the secretary of state says is unnecessary. ...
11 Mar, 2025
-
1 min read
Vote here signs outside a building.
To Avoid Confusion, Should RCV Just Be Called Instant Runoff Elections?
In discussions with an elderly voter in Colorado about Proposition 131, the unsuccessful 2024 ballot measure to create a nonpartisan primary with ranked choice voting (RCV), in the general election, we learned something important. This individual had voted against Proposition 131, casting his mail ballot on the day he received it. A week later, he received a campaign ad mailer that Colorado’s governor and Denver’s mayor had endorsed Proposition 131, which may have influenced his decision....
11 Mar, 2025
-
5 min read
Sky view of the US capitol building.
Democracy Expert Larry Diamond Warns of Growing Culture of SuperPAC Intimidation in Congress
In his new regular column, Diamond on Democracy, democracy scholar Larry Diamond, acknowledges that “[h]aving won the presidency fair and square, Donald Trump has earned the right to propose, and in many cases to implement, radical new policy directions.” ...
11 Mar, 2025
-
3 min read