Hawks Lost the War on Drugs -- Get Over It

Hawks Lost the War on Drugs -- Get Over It
Published: 13 Nov, 2014
2 min read

While the news is focusing on the newly-elected Republican Congress wrangling with whether or not to overturn Washington, D.C.'s decriminalization of marijuana, the "War on Drugs" continues to be lost on all fronts.The

National Institute on Drug Abuse reports heroin use is on a dramatic rise since 2007,  with numbers reaching all-time highs. The cause of the problem: cheap street heroin due to a large market supply.

The sad reality, though, is that our War on Terror in Afghanistan is the sole cause of this glut of heroin.

For all the Taliban's faults, to their credit, they had almost completely eradicated the production of opium (the source of heroin) in Afghanistan prior to the American invasion. With NATO forces continuing to leave, opium production is at all-time highs with Afghanistan producing over 80 percent of the world's opium supply.

When we invaded Afghanistan in 2001, only 50,000 acres (78 sq. miles) of opium were grown in the entire country. In 2014, after 13 years of U.S. and NATO control, there are 22.5 million acres (35,156 sq. miles) of opium production -- almost 15 percent of the total landmass of Afghanistan!

What's worse, this is the number of acres cultivated AFTER the U.S. spent $7 billion trying to eradicate production.

How can they be doing this badly? It's not like they are hunting for a stray patch here and there; we're talking about 1 out of every 7 acres in the entire country under opium cultivation.

What is this money being spent on? If so much of the drug remains in production, how much did U.S. forces actually destroy? Something smells fishy.

If the full weight of our military in a country roughly the size of Texas can't stop 15 percent of the total land area from being used to cultivate opium, what makes us think that we can ever win the war on drugs at home?It's time for everyone to accept that the war on drugs is a lost cause.

IVP Donate

I personally don't get it -- the Republicans are wholly against the "nanny state" except when they have to protect people from themselves by outlawing street drugs. Especially when studies have shown that most drug users are happy, successful people, and not poor criminals abusing the welfare system.

In general, every single state that has implemented drug testing for welfare recipients has experienced the same phenomenon -- they aren't finding very many drug addicts using welfare and it is costing the state more to test than it's worth.

It's time we change our attitudes on drugs. Winners will be winners, losers will be losers, regardless of their drugs of choice: alcohol, marijuana, and/or prescription or street drugs.

Photo Credit: vetkit / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Xavier Becerra Bolts Into First Place in IVN California Governor Poll
Xavier Becerra Bolts Into First Place in IVN California Governor Poll
Survey of 3,404 verified California voters shows Democrat in front. Second-choice data reveals where Yee's supporters are headed....
20 Apr, 2026
-
8 min read
Judge Slams Door on New Attack Against California’s Top Two Primary
Judge Slams Door on New Attack Against California’s Top Two Primary
A group of minor parties in California challenged the state's nonpartisan Top Two primary in court and a federal judge handed them another loss, ruling in part that they can’t keep suing over arguments already rejected by other courts....
15 Apr, 2026
-
4 min read
Why We Call Ourselves Independent Voter News
Why We Call Ourselves Independent Voter News
For 15 years, we have published more than 14,000 articles written by people from different walks of life, different parts of the country, and different political backgrounds....
01 Apr, 2026
-
2 min read