Rep. Walter Jones Leads Effort to Declassify Full 9/11 Report

image
Published: 08 Sep, 2014
2 min read

When Congress returns to session there will be many topics on the agenda ranging from a possible declaration of war against the Islamic State to immigration reform. Yet for one congressman from North Carolina, another issue takes precedence.

Last December, Walter Jones, a Republican from the Tar Heel State, introduced the simply titled HR 428: Urging the president to release information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States. A short bill, Jones believes:

"(1) the President should declassify the 28-page section of the Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001; and "(2) the families of the victims and the people of the United States deserve answers about the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, attacks upon the United States."

In a discussion on the Ron Paul Channel, Jones cited the need to understand the relationship with the Saudis and said it would be "embarrassing for the [Bush administration] if this information was released to the public."

Introduced in December, Jones' bill was moved to committee and remains there with 10 cosponsors.

Kentucky U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, one of Jones' House supporters, said in a television interview that the redacted pages of the report changed his "understanding of history." It also led him to ask, "Why did my government keep this from me for 13 years? What were their motives?"

In originally classifying the 28 pages in question, President George W. Bush

cited national security reasons.

In the midst of congressional midterm elections and questions about what, if anything, the U.S. should do about the Islamic State, declassifying 28 pages from the 9/11 report may sound like a distraction or digging up ancient history.

However, it also begs the questions Massie already asked: Why has it taken the government so long to allow the American public to know what led up to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks? Why, when the 13th anniversary of the attacks approaches, are there still fundamental questions surrounding the event?

While some lawmakers work to declassify these documents, the Justice Department recently declassified a 2004 memo that approved warrantless surveillance. With the leaks of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, it became known that the programs resulted in the collection of Internet metadata.

IVP Donate

There are also indications that the American people are interested to find out more about the attacks. A Rasmussen poll from July found that nearly one-quarter of those surveyed thought the U.S. government had some advance knowledge of the attacks and did nothing while 19 percent were unsure.

Walter Jones' effort to declassify the remaining pages of the 9/11 report do not center on conspiracy theories per se. However, the revelations from Snowden do show that there are likely lingering questions and suspicions that the government is not telling the whole truth.

Photo retrieved from NationalMemo.com. No credit attributed.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read