Rep. Walter Jones Leads Effort to Declassify Full 9/11 Report

image
Published: 08 Sep, 2014
2 min read

When Congress returns to session there will be many topics on the agenda ranging from a possible declaration of war against the Islamic State to immigration reform. Yet for one congressman from North Carolina, another issue takes precedence.

Last December, Walter Jones, a Republican from the Tar Heel State, introduced the simply titled HR 428: Urging the president to release information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States. A short bill, Jones believes:

"(1) the President should declassify the 28-page section of the Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 2001; and "(2) the families of the victims and the people of the United States deserve answers about the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, attacks upon the United States."

In a discussion on the Ron Paul Channel, Jones cited the need to understand the relationship with the Saudis and said it would be "embarrassing for the [Bush administration] if this information was released to the public."

Introduced in December, Jones' bill was moved to committee and remains there with 10 cosponsors.

Kentucky U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, one of Jones' House supporters, said in a television interview that the redacted pages of the report changed his "understanding of history." It also led him to ask, "Why did my government keep this from me for 13 years? What were their motives?"

In originally classifying the 28 pages in question, President George W. Bush

cited national security reasons.

In the midst of congressional midterm elections and questions about what, if anything, the U.S. should do about the Islamic State, declassifying 28 pages from the 9/11 report may sound like a distraction or digging up ancient history.

However, it also begs the questions Massie already asked: Why has it taken the government so long to allow the American public to know what led up to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks? Why, when the 13th anniversary of the attacks approaches, are there still fundamental questions surrounding the event?

While some lawmakers work to declassify these documents, the Justice Department recently declassified a 2004 memo that approved warrantless surveillance. With the leaks of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, it became known that the programs resulted in the collection of Internet metadata.

IVP Donate

There are also indications that the American people are interested to find out more about the attacks. A Rasmussen poll from July found that nearly one-quarter of those surveyed thought the U.S. government had some advance knowledge of the attacks and did nothing while 19 percent were unsure.

Walter Jones' effort to declassify the remaining pages of the 9/11 report do not center on conspiracy theories per se. However, the revelations from Snowden do show that there are likely lingering questions and suspicions that the government is not telling the whole truth.

Photo retrieved from NationalMemo.com. No credit attributed.

You Might Also Like

California 2026 Independent Voter Survey
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
A new statewide poll conducted by the Independent Voter Project finds California’s independent voters overwhelmingly support the state’s nonpartisan primary system and express broad dissatisfaction with the direction of state politics....
12 Jan, 2026
-
4 min read
Disposable Vape Ban SB 762 Jacqui Irwin
This California Disposable Vape Ban Could Devastate The Legal Cannabis Industry Even Further
Good intentions often make for compelling policy. But in practice, consequences rarely fall in line as neatly as the ideas that inspired them....
12 Jan, 2026
-
6 min read
Missouri Republican Denny Hoskins Gerrymandering Manipulation
Missouri Republicans Admit They Skewed Ballot Language to Protect a Rigged Map
Missouri state officials have pulled out all the stops to prevent a veto referendum from getting on the ballot that would overturn a mid-cycle gerrymander. This includes writing a ballot summary that makes it sound like the veto referendum is trying to protect gerrymandering in the state....
13 Jan, 2026
-
4 min read