In Traditional Elections, Ballot Access Remains a Problem for Third Parties

image
Andrew GrippAndrew Gripp
Published: 07 Aug, 2014
2 min read

As IVN contributor AJ Signieri described in June, third parties in Illinois struggle to secure a place on the state’s general election ballots. If a party’s nominee for governor does not cross the 5 percent threshold, the party is considered a “new party” and must collect at least 25,000 signatures to appear on the next ballot. “Established parties” that cross this threshold -- the Democratic and Republican parties -- only need to collect 5,000 signatures.

This year, three minor parties collected the requisite number of signatures, including the Libertarian Party, the Green Party, and the Constitution Party.

However, the established parties in Illinois are challenging the validity of thousands of these signatures -- enough to push each party below the 25,000 mark and keep them off November’s ballot.

For instance, John Fogarty, general counsel for the Illinois Republican Party, represented two objectors who are challenging 23,791 signatures in support of the Libertarian Party. The party collected roughly 43,000 signatures all together.

Objectors tied to the Democratic Party in Illinois are also

questioning approximately 12,000 of the Green Party’s 30,000 collected signatures, including the signature of Sheldon Schafer, the party’s candidate for secretary of state.

The Green Party has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state’s legal hurdles for minor parties. The lawsuit stresses the financial liabilities incurred by third parties, which must provide representatives to vouch for individual signatures during a process that can last an entire week.

The lawsuit also contests the mandate that minor parties run a full slate of candidates -- a mandate that does not apply to the state’s established parties.

The Constitution Party, whose signatures the Republican Party has also challenged, has declared its intent to join the Green Party’s lawsuit in Summers v. Smart.

In Pennsylvania, the Libertarian and Green parties both failed to collect the requisite number of signatures -- approximately 17,000 -- to contest the gubernatorial race in November. In June 2014, both parties also filed a federal lawsuit challenging strict rules concerning the collection and notarization of signatures.

IVP Donate

In July 2014, New Hampshire’s Libertarian Party challenged a new law that bars parties from petitioning for party status in odd years -- a stipulation that poses a significant barrier to minor parties given the state's high threshold for appearing on the ballot. A judge extended the deadline for the state to respond to the lawsuit, pushing it back to September 2014.

You Might Also Like

Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
Will the Texas Republican Party be Successful Where the Hawaiian Democratic Party Failed?
The Republican Party of Texas (RPT) is suing Secretary of State Jane Nelson in an effort to close the state’s primary elections to party members only – a move that the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) tried back in 2013 in its state and failed. ...
05 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Retired Attorney Takes Voting Rights Case All the Way to the Supreme Court -- By Himself
The next big voting rights case the Supreme Court of the United States could consider wasn’t filed by the ACLU, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or another household name when it comes to voter rights. ...
09 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
congress flag
Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians
There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop....
10 Sep, 2025
-
3 min read