Media Starting to Report Realities of Partisan Primary Systems

image
Published: 29 Apr, 2014
Updated: 14 Oct, 2022
2 min read

A local news station in New Mexico, KOB 4, recently aired a story about how independent voters in the state are excluded from the upcoming primaries, which will be held on June 3. The inability of independent voters (and all voters) to have full and meaningful participation in the election process has long been ignored by most media outlets, but as the number of independent voters rise, it is getting harder for traditional media outlets to overlook.

"Don't look now, but there's an election sneaking up on us – an election in which thousands of New Mexicans won't be allowed to vote," Stuart Dyson reports, "even though they're registered and their tax dollars are helping to pay for the entire thing."

Thousands may be underselling it a bit.

As of March 31, 2014, voters who declined to state party affiliation was 240,213. From this number, it is hard to determine just how many are independent voters, members of a third party, or just didn't want to state their affiliation. However, added to the number of voters registered "Other," there were a total of 279,007 voters not registered with either major party -- 21.9 percent of the electorate.

Most of these voters registered the way they did for a reason. However, none of these voters will be able to participate in the June primary elections. New Mexico has closed primaries, which means only registered party members can participate. The parties can choose to conduct semi-closed primaries if they want, allowing independent and third party voters a little extra time to change their voter registration. To date, however, the primaries for both major parties are closed.

Either way, closed and semi-closed primaries still deny voters not affiliated with the Republican or Democratic parties complete and meaningful participation in the public election process even though they contribute to the funding of these elections. According to the KOB 4 report, the 2014 primary elections are going to cost $3.1 million. It is a steep price to pay when one-fifth of the voting population cannot participate and only 28 percent of voters eligible to participate cast a ballot in the primaries 4 years ago.

No photo credit attributed

Latest articles

CA capitol building dome with flags.
Why is CA Senator Mike McGuire Trying to Kill the Legal Cannabis Industry?
California’s legal cannabis industry is under mounting pressure, and in early June, state lawmakers and the governor appeared poised to help. A bill to freeze the state’s cannabis excise tax at 15% sailed through the State Assembly with a unanimous 74-0 vote. The governor’s office backed the plan. And legal cannabis businesses, still struggling to compete with unregulated sellers and mounting operating costs, saw a glimmer of hope....
03 Jul, 2025
-
7 min read
I voted buttons
After First RCV Election, Charlottesville Voters Back the Reform: 'They Get It, They Like It, They Want to Do It Again'
A new survey out of Charlottesville, Virginia, shows overwhelming support for ranked choice voting (RCV) following the city’s first use of the system in its June Democratic primary for City Council. Conducted one week after the election, the results found that nearly 90% of respondents support continued use of RCV....
03 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read