Revolutionary Nonpartisan Primary Elections Proposed in Oregon

Author: Michael Higham
Published: 18 Oct, 2013
●
Updated: 14 Oct, 2022●
1 min read
Jeff Mapes of OregonLive.com covered the story of Mark Frohnmayer -- son of David Frohnmayer, an established member of Oregon politics, law, and academia -- pushing for a version of the nonpartisan top-two primary system. It is identical to California and Washington systems, but with a twist; approval voting.
The Oregon initiative would complete the nonpartisan primary's trek along the West coast. It will need 87,416 signatures from registered voters to qualify for the November 2014 ballot.
"" - Mark FrohnmayerThe article explained the system and Frohnmayer's thoughts on partisanship and electoral reform:
[Mark] Frohnmayer, who helped build a successful video game company and now heads a fledgling electric vehicle company, wants to replace the state's partisan primaries with an "approval voting primary." Under this system, all of the candidates for a particular office would run against each other in the primary, with the top two finishers advancing to the general. That system is familiar and has been adopted by both California and Washington. However, under Frohnmayer's plan, voters wouldn't be restricted to supporting just one candidate. They would be able to vote for as many as they wanted. The idea is that this would help ensure that a candidate opposed by a majority of voters wouldn't emerge from a crowded primary with just a weak plurality. "What really inspired me to do this was the federal government shutdown," said Frohnmayer. He argued that the shutdown was sparked by Tea-Party friendly members of Congress who won office by catering to a relatively narrow base of conservative primary voters. "The primary system we have now effectively disenfranchises a third of the voters right out of the gate," said Frohnmayer, referring to the third of voters who aren't registered with either the Democratic or Republican parties.
Image credit: News Register
Latest articles
Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political
For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades....
30 Jun, 2025
-
2 min read
Has Trump Made His Case for the Nobel Peace Prize?
A news item in recent days that was overshadowed in the media by SCOTUS and the One Big Beautiful Budget Bill was a US-brokered peace agreement that was signed between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – which if it holds will end a conflict between the two countries that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands of people....
30 Jun, 2025
-
7 min read
Knives Come Out Against Reform at NYC CRC Hearing as Independents Rise
Last week in Staten Island, the NYC Charter Revision Commission held its next-to-last public hearing. As Commissioner Diane Savino commented, addressing NYC's closed primary system “is the single biggest issue we’ve heard this year.”...
30 Jun, 2025
-
3 min read