Independent Bernie Sanders On Wiretapping: "Nothing Unusual"

image
Published: 12 Jun, 2013
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022
2 min read

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdcHBifH5fg&feature=youtu.be

Speaking on the floor of the Senate Tuesday, Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) offered his view on warrantless wiretapping:

"It turns out that what the Obama administration was doing to the AP is nothing unusual. This appears to be exactly what the government has the capability to do to every single American. Furthermore, we have also recently learned that the government has the capability to monitor every website that we visit, every video that we see, and every item that we search for online."

Senator Sanders elaborated by citing Republican Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin), one of the co-authors of the Patriot Act. In a letter to the president last week, Rep. Sensenbrenner said:

"As the author of the Patriot Act, I am extrememly disturbed by what appears to be an overbroad interpretation of the Act. The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) applied for a top secret court order to collect the phone records of virtually every call that has been made by millions of Verizon customers. These reports are deeply concerning and raise questions about whether our constitutional rights are secure."

First instituted in 2001, the practice of warrantless wiretapping began through the Patriot Act, but was ended in 2007. Shortly before leaving office in 2008, George Bush signed H.R. 6304 into law.

Also called the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, the legislation, sponsored by Rep. Silvestre Reyes (R-Texas) granted the government surveillance immunity from warrants for up to one week provided the FISA court was notified.

Sen. Sanders' insight describes the surveillance industry's comfort with eschewing privacy protections. For agencies like the NSA, CIA, and FBI, collecting data without a warrant is nothing new. Even further they have been legally insulated to do so.

Sanders also quoted the Fourth Amendment, "and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read