Amendment to Limit Drone Use In Southern California Passes In US Senate

image
Published: 15 May, 2013
1 min read

During the review of immigration reform on Tuesday,  the Senate Judiciary Committee  voted in favor of Senator Feinstein's amendment that would protect more of Southern California from US Customs' drone oversight.

The original version of the bill includes Article 1106 , titled “Equipement and Technology,” which reads:

“ENHANCEMENTS.—The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, working through U.S. Border Patrol, shall—1. deploy additional mobile, video, and agent-portable surveillance systems, and unarmed, unmanned aerial vehicles in the Southwest Border region as necessary to provide 24-hour operation and surveillance;2. operate unarmed unmanned aerial vehicles along the Southern border for 24 hours per day and for 7 days per week”

This provision would have been applicable to an area within 100 miles of the border with Mexico, potentially including the San Diego area and it's millions of inhabitants.

Considering the important privacy concerns this would raise in such a densely populated area, Senator Feinstein's amendment creates an exemption from drone oversight specifically for Southern California. The amendment reads:

(b) LIMITATION.—(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), and except as provided in paragraph (2), U.S. Border Patrol may not operate unarmed, unmanned aerial vehicles in the San Diego and El Centro Sectors, except within 3 miles of the Southern border.(2) EXCEPTION.—The limitation under this subsection shall not restrict the maritime operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

With the already strong concerns over the use of drones and their potential violation of privacy rights, the vote in favor of this amendment will be a relief for many Californians.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read