State Senate Passes Bill Increasing Penalty for 'Swatting'

image
Published: 09 May, 2013
Updated: 14 Oct, 2022
1 min read
Credit: LA Times

swatting

'Swatting' is a term used for making a hoax 9-1-1 call in an attempt to get the dispatcher to call in an emergency service response based on a false report. It is called 'swatting' because the ultimate goal is to get a SWAT team response.

The practice has caught the attention of media outlets nationwide because well-known celebrities have been among the targets of the hoax. Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Police Department decided to keep celebrity swatting incidents a secret in hopes that the lack of media coverage would discourage "swatters."

Swatting is a headache for law enforcement officers and lawmakers because it is a drain on city and county resources. Under current California law, it is already a crime punishable by one year in jail or a fine up to $1,000. The punishment can also be greater if the prank call intentionally sends emergency service responders into harm's way.

On Thursday, SB 333, introduced by Senator Ted Lieu (D-Torrance), passed the California Senate with a unanimous vote, 33-0. The bill would increase the penalty for swatting by requiring those responsible for the hoax to cover the cost of the incident. This could mean a fine up to $10,000 per incident. If a minor is convicted, his or her parents would have to foot the bill.

Lieu has first-hand experience being a victim of swatting.

On April 19, police responded to a call reporting that Lieu had shot his wife in their Torrance home. The senator was out of town when the call was made and Lieu told TMZ his wife was at home sick.

The bill will now go to the Assembly for consideration. Considering the bipartisan support in the Senate, it seems likely the legislation will receive very little resistance and will end up on Governor Brown's desk.

 

IVP Donate

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read