State Senate Passes Bill Increasing Penalty for 'Swatting'

State Senate Passes Bill Increasing Penalty for 'Swatting'
Published: 09 May, 2013
1 min read

Credit: LA Times

swatting

'Swatting' is a term used for making a hoax 9-1-1 call in an attempt to get the dispatcher to call in an emergency service response based on a false report. It is called 'swatting' because the ultimate goal is to get a SWAT team response.

The practice has caught the attention of media outlets nationwide because well-known celebrities have been among the targets of the hoax. Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Police Department decided to keep celebrity swatting incidents a secret in hopes that the lack of media coverage would discourage "swatters."

Swatting is a headache for law enforcement officers and lawmakers because it is a drain on city and county resources. Under current California law, it is already a crime punishable by one year in jail or a fine up to $1,000. The punishment can also be greater if the prank call intentionally sends emergency service responders into harm's way.

On Thursday, SB 333, introduced by Senator Ted Lieu (D-Torrance), passed the California Senate with a unanimous vote, 33-0. The bill would increase the penalty for swatting by requiring those responsible for the hoax to cover the cost of the incident. This could mean a fine up to $10,000 per incident. If a minor is convicted, his or her parents would have to foot the bill.

Lieu has first-hand experience being a victim of swatting.

On April 19, police responded to a call reporting that Lieu had shot his wife in their Torrance home. The senator was out of town when the call was made and Lieu told TMZ his wife was at home sick.

The bill will now go to the Assembly for consideration. Considering the bipartisan support in the Senate, it seems likely the legislation will receive very little resistance and will end up on Governor Brown's desk.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read