California Sen. Cannella Targets Cyber Revenge with SB 255

California Sen. Cannella Targets Cyber Revenge with SB 255
Published: 09 May, 2013
1 min read
cyber revenge

Credit: CNN

Introduced by State Senator Cannella, California's SB 255 would make it illegal to distribute information and images of any person with the intent to cause humiliation and emotional distress without consent.

Made possible by technological advances, "cyber revenge" is the sharing of unethical photos and information with the intent of causing cyber stalking, harassment, humiliation, and emotional distress on the party involved.

“People who post or text pictures that are meant to be private as a way to seek revenge are reprehensible. Right now, there is no tool for law enforcement to protect the victims,” says Cannella in a recent Press Release. “Too many have had their lives upended because of an action of another that they trusted. This is a common sense bill that clamps down on those who exploit intimacy and trust for revenge or personal gain.”

The language of the bill specifically targets communication associated with the digital world, speaking to the shortcomings of current law in addressing modern needs. Included in the definition of "electronic communication devices" are telephones and cell phones, which could have serious implications on the future of text messaging.

"It is unfortunate that we have to create legislation to protect individuals from the misuse of technology," said Christine Ward, executive director of Crime Victims Action Alliance. "I applaud Senator Cannella for his efforts to prevent future victimization in California."

What makes regulations on electronic communications difficult, however, is our lack of understanding of digital messages. While technology provides us the means to respond instantly, what's lacking in tone, context, and body language often leads to misinterpretation. Misinterpretation makes it hard to decipher intent, making the enforcement of this bill questionable.

If passed, violators could face up to one year in a county jail and/or a fine up to one thousand dollars.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read