Your Twitter Pictures Are Protected

image
420 Times420 Times
Published: 16 Jan, 2013
2 min read

Your Twitter Pictures Are Protected

With the vast amount of information available on social media sites, crowd sourcing has become common practice for online journalists. As discussed in last month's Twitter Best Practices for Journalists Workshop, crowd sourcing provides journalists with usable content curated from social networks.

While this can be an invaluable tool for journalists, recent legal challenges beg the question, who owns your tweets? According to a Monday U.S. District Court ruling, you do and news agencies cannot use your content without first receiving permission.

In 2010, photojournalist Daniel Morel was caught in the middle of a legal battle over the unauthorized publishing of his photos by both the Agence France Presse and The Washington Post. Captured after a 2010 earthquake in Haiti by Morel, the photos were distributed to Getty Images by AFP and later reposted by The Washington Post, a client of Getty Images.

"While the service terms do allow the reposting and rebroadcasting of users' images in certain circumstances, such as 'retweeting' them," Reuters reports, "it does not grant a license for commercial use."

District Judge Alison Nathan granted a motion for summary judgement, arguing that Twitter's Terms of Service made clear the policy regarding distribution of photos. Twitter does not give news organizations the right to publish photos sin permission, establishing a standard for publishers across the Internet.

Clarifying the Terms of Service, a Twitter spokesman said, "As has always been our policy, Twitter users own their photos."

Highlighting the increased interest in intellectual property law in relation to social media, the case could have serious implications for digital media and online journalism. What was once accepted to be public information has been labeled intellectual property, requiring permissions to distribute for commercial use.

Following public outcry over Instagram's new and arguably intrusive Terms of Service, Monday's ruling brings us one step closer to defining intellectual property rights on social media. Your Twitter pictures are protected...for now.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read