Baseball, Politics & Public Money

image
Published: 07 Aug, 2012
2 min read

 

The item that follows is more than a baseball note. Baseball teams that play in ballparks funded in whole or part by public money are thereby inherently fair game for political comment and judgment:

Bill Center of the U-T San Diego reported last night on the newspaper's Web site, and confirmed in a major front page story today, the Padres have been sold for $800 million to the O'Malley family, generally celebrated in LA for their ownership of the Dodgers.

Walter O'Malley, the father and grandfather of the new majority owners, was a major figure in baseball history, as he and Horace Stoneham changed the game when they moved the Dodgers and Giants west to LA and SF in 1958.

How will the new out-of-town majority owners be received?

The reaction of most fans and media will focus on how much money will they spend?

My concerns are twofold, neither of which relates to spending money for high profile players. They are: 1) keeping Tom Garfinkel as president and CEO, and 2) the depth of the O’Malley’s civic commitment.

Center reports Garfinkel is staying, which is reassuring at the leadership level, given my strong feeling that changing out Garfinkel for people who know neither our town nor our team makes zero sense; and if Garfinkel is indeed staying, that’s reassuring and answers my second concern, civic commitment. (To be fair, Ron Fowler, who is a member of the new ownership group, along with golfer Phil Mickelson, is one of our city’s most generous benefactors.)

IVP Donate

I have no idea as to the O’Malley politics, but if they are as conservative as most baseball owners (the Red Sox are a notable exception), they will be well received by the business community of San Diego, which is conservative and Republican, but I repeat myself.

Besides, no one will care about their politics because there is nothing in their history to suggest that they, like Joe Ricketts of the Chicago Cubs, would ever get caught in a race baiting campaign to defeat President Obama. (The New York Times reported some months back that Ricketts was spending $10 million to fund a study to see how the president might be tied, a second time, to Reverend Jeremiah Wright.)

On the price of $800 to buy our hometown team, I have nothing to add. If you want an explanation it makes sense to ask someone who went to Wharton or Harvard.

On second thought, maybe not, because those are same people who brought us hedge funds.

 

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read