Pennsylvania Voters Challenge Voter ID Law

image
Published: 25 Jul, 2012
1 min read
From the ACLU Blog

Pennsylvania voters, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, appeared before the state this morning, challenging the new state voter ID laws that threaten to disenfranchise 1 million of the 8.3 million registered voters in the state. The hearing comes one day after the plaintiffs, joined by activists and demonstrators, protested the law outside the state capitol.

"They know that, when people don't vote, they win. ... We're going to stop it and stand at the borders of Pennsylvania and say 'everybody in America has a right to vote.'" - Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President Rick Bloomingdale

https://twitter.com/BrennanCenter/status/228123453348257793

Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth Carol Aichele defends the law, arguing that it is "valid and will sustain any kind of test."

Civil rights activists, voters, and organizations have historically hounded states for citing voter fraud as a defense of voter ID laws. Which is why Pennsylvania will abandon that argument in today's hearings. According to NPR, the state has never investigated voter fraud claims, thus will not argue for past fraud. Both sides agree that there is no evidence of in-person fraud. Instead, the state will argue, much like Indiana in 2008, that the state has a "valid interest" in preventing future fraud.

Aichele continues to defend the law by outlining steps her department will take to make acquiring identification cards more accessible for voters. On top of these steps, she also cites an "intensive voter-education effort" as a means for preventing disenfranchisement.

The hearing will continue into next week, with a decision coming as early as August 13, says Judge Robert Simpson.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read