Pennsylvania Voters Challenge Voter ID Law

image
Published: 25 Jul, 2012
1 min read
From the ACLU Blog

Pennsylvania voters, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, appeared before the state this morning, challenging the new state voter ID laws that threaten to disenfranchise 1 million of the 8.3 million registered voters in the state. The hearing comes one day after the plaintiffs, joined by activists and demonstrators, protested the law outside the state capitol.

"They know that, when people don't vote, they win. ... We're going to stop it and stand at the borders of Pennsylvania and say 'everybody in America has a right to vote.'" - Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President Rick Bloomingdale

https://twitter.com/BrennanCenter/status/228123453348257793

Pennsylvania Secretary of Commonwealth Carol Aichele defends the law, arguing that it is "valid and will sustain any kind of test."

Civil rights activists, voters, and organizations have historically hounded states for citing voter fraud as a defense of voter ID laws. Which is why Pennsylvania will abandon that argument in today's hearings. According to NPR, the state has never investigated voter fraud claims, thus will not argue for past fraud. Both sides agree that there is no evidence of in-person fraud. Instead, the state will argue, much like Indiana in 2008, that the state has a "valid interest" in preventing future fraud.

Aichele continues to defend the law by outlining steps her department will take to make acquiring identification cards more accessible for voters. On top of these steps, she also cites an "intensive voter-education effort" as a means for preventing disenfranchisement.

The hearing will continue into next week, with a decision coming as early as August 13, says Judge Robert Simpson.

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read