Time to Move Beyond Clean Energy Boom and Bust

[/caption]

In yet another sign of a growing consensus in support of energy policies that prioritize innovation, the New York Times on Sunday endorsed the recommendations of “Beyond Boom and Bust,” a recent report by experts at the Breakthrough Institute, the Brookings Institution, and the World Resources Institute.

The Times urged Congress to reform federal energy subsidies to “reward lower costs and better performance” in order to drive low-carbon technologies towards unsubsidized cost competitiveness and end the cycle of boom and bust that threatens the vital clean tech sector.

“The idea is not to prop up clean tech industries forever. It is to get them to a point where they can stand on their own,” the paper said. The Times called the report “a timely effort to attach real numbers to an increasingly politicized debate over energy subsidies.”

Federal support for clean tech is headed for a cliff. Without congressional action, funding is set to drop 75 percent from its 2009 peak of $44 billion to just $11 billion in 2014, according to the report.

Public investments have paid off – and garnered massive private investments to grow the sector. Clean tech was one of the few sectors to add jobs during the Great Recession, and significant gains were made in the cost and performance of clean energy technologies, especially in wind and solar generation.

The debate over clean energy has become highly politicized. But some Republicans – including Senators Lisa Murkowski, Richard Lugar and John Thune – have suggested that the path forward may lie with innovation-centered reforms.

Policy makers should see the increasing maturation of clean energy technologies and the impending drop in federal investment as an opportunity to enact smart reforms that drive technological progress, create jobs, and use taxpayer resources wisely.