House Approves Bill To Extend Student Loan Rates

image
Published: 27 Apr, 2012
2 min read

 

Today, the House voted 215 to 195 to pass a GOP proposed bill to extend the current student loan interest rate of 3.4%, instead of permitting the rate to double on July 1 to 6.8%.

Backed by House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the proposed bill (H.R. 4628) would cover the estimated $6 billion cost of extending the 3.4% interest rate by pulling funds from Obama's Prevention and Public Health Fund.

In a White House issued Statement of Administration Policy, the Office of Management and Budget indicated that President Barack Obama would veto the House GOP bill:

"The Administration strongly supports serious, bipartisan efforts to prevent interest rates from doubling for over 7 million college students in the coming year," and  "Taking action to stop the doubling of these rates will save students $1,000, on average, over the life of their loans." The statement continued, "Unfortunately, rather than finding common ground on a way to pay for this critical policy, H.R. 4628 includes an attempt to repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund, created to help prevent disease, detect it early, and manage conditions before they become severe."

The Obama Administration goes on to state that the Prevention and Public Health Fund, or the program that GOP plans to cut to fund the one-year extension, would specifically benefit women. It reads, "Women, in particular, will benefit from this Prevention Fund, which would provide for hundreds of thousands of screenings for breast and cervical cancer."

Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) furthered the attack on Republican lawmakers, stating, "we are seeing the sheer gender bias in this institution against meeting women's needs." In response, a representative for Boehner reaffirmed "gender has nothing to do with this debate," while Boehner himself called the attack "beneath the dignity of the White House."

While the bill passed in the House, it is unlikely to move beyond the Senate, where the majority of Democrats have written a new version of the bill that would not take funding away from the Prevention Fund. Instead, the drafted bill would raise taxes to pay for the one-year extension. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) explains:

“We can pay for this with a tax that people who make a lot of money have been avoiding for a long time by changing from ordinary income, they put this into sub-chapter S and avoid taxes.”

In this all too familiar example of partisan politics, both parties' refusal to compromise may cost students $1000 more in loans a year, showing the very real cost of partisan gridlock.

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read