Skip to content
Subscribe

Cadiz Plan Highlights Magnitude of California Water Problems

Published:
california-water-problem

In areas like New England, water isn’t a problem. There are ample river, lakes, and reservoirs, as well as plenty of rain. The water is locally-based and doesn’t need to be piped long distances. There may be occasional droughts, but they don’t last long and generally are of little concern. The water situation in California and the Southwest is, of course, quite different. Droughts can last for years and water supplies frequently come from hundreds of miles away. Cadiz Inc. of Los Angeles is proposing an ambitious, controversial water transfer and storage plan that, regardless of its advantages or problems, demonstrates the seriousness of California’s water problem.

Cadiz, CA is located in a desert area north of Joshua Tree National Park and east of the Marine Corps Twentynine Palms base. Phase 1 of their plan is to grab rain water flowing down from mountains into dry lakes then pump it 44 miles to the Colorado River Aqueduct. Excess water would be stored in collection wells. Cadiz says this will save substantial amounts of water from evaporating on the dry lakes. Water districts would be able to store water for future usage in wet years. Phase 2 of their plan is far more controversial and entails pumping up to 1 million acre-feet of water into underground aquifers for storage and later use. As part of Phase 2, Cadiz is considering buying 300 miles of unused natural gas pipeline and converting it to be used for transporting water. They are also raising $225 million to fund the project.

The history of the Cadiz attempt is long and tangled. They’ve been trying to do this for twenty years. A previous attempt ten years ago was met with strong opposition including from formidable California Senator Dianne Feinstein. But she is reserving judgment on the current Cadiz plan until she has more facts.

Others are openly skeptical. Huntington Beach Mayor Debbie Cook says it’s worse than the old plan. Other worry about the effect of building pipelines in the desert or if siphoning off groundwater from dry lakes will have a deleterious effect on surrounding wildlife and vegetation.

Much of California’s water already is pumped hundreds of miles from the Sacramento Delta and the Colorado River. The Cadiz plan would add more pumping. California needs to realize that its water supply is tenuous, fragile, and expensive to maintain and that this will only get worse unless steps are taken to alleviate the problem. More construction isn’t the only answer. We need conservation too. Every step of the way, the water supply needs to be preserved and less water used whenever possible.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Cadiz Plan Highlights Magnitude of California Water Problems

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us