Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: Majority of Republicans unsatisfied with current field of presidential candidates

Published:

As primary season rolls on, a recent CBS poll of Republican voters finds that they are not satisfied with the current crop of GOP presidential candidates.  According to the survey, 58% of Republican voters want more candidate choices even with the presidential selection process already in motion.  That’s up 12% since October 2011. Only 37% of the voters polled are satisfied with the current field vying for the nomination.

Back in June 2011, 71% of Republican primary voters expressed the desire for more choices at a time when the GOP field was already crowded. Although a lower percentage now, the desire for more options has remained fairly constant.

In the sample polled, there isn’t that much enthusiasm for any of the candidates currently running. Only 33% of Republican primary voters say that they would enthusiastically back former Senator Rick Santorum if he became the nominee. It’s the highest of any of the other candidates. Meanwhile, a quarter of Republican voters have reservations about him.

27% of Republican primary voters would enthusiastically back Romney, 29% would enthusiastically back Gingrich, and 15% would enthusiastically back Ron Paul according to the poll’s results. What’s interesting to note is that 17% of Republican primary voters said that they would not vote for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich if he were the nominee, and 20% said the same about Congressman Ron Paul. The poll noted that Republican voters would be least enthusiastic about former Ambassador Jon Huntsman as the nominee.

These results come, however, as Paul finished a solid third in Iowa, while Huntsman could score a top three finish in the New Hampshire primary. An American Research Group poll of likely New Hampshire voters finds both Paul and Huntsman virtually tied for second place in the primary contest, one in which Independents can make a splash.

There are potentially a number of different reasons for the lack of enthusiasm amongst Republican voters, including the lack of clarity after the Iowa Caucuses and the issue of electability in the general election. At the end of the day, however, the dissatisfaction of party-aligned voters could indicate a problem within the current political process.  Nevertheless, despite their tempered opinions about the field of candidates, the poll did find that Republicans are very enthusiastic about voting in 2012.

The CBS poll was conducted via telephone from January 4-8, 2012 among 1,413 adults nationwide. 1,247 interviews were conducted with registered voters and 440 with voters who said they plan to vote in a Republican primary. The margin of error is estimated to be +/-3 percentage points among registered voters and 5 points for the sample of Republican primary voters.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Poll: Majority of Republicans unsatisfied with current field of presidential candidates

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us