Political parties attempt to undermine open primary election reform in California

Political parties attempt to undermine open primary election reform in California
Published: 08 Sep, 2011
1 min read

In an attempt to blunt the upcoming top-two open primary's ability to limit political party control over elections in California, the state Assembly is trying to change the way a candidate's political party appears on the ballot. Proposition 14, passed by the voters in 2010, changed the primary system to consolidate all of the candidates onto one ballot, with the top two vote getters advancing to the general election. Candidates are only required to list their party preference, allowing Independents to run with the ballot designation "no party preference." AB 1413 aims to undermine the reforms by changing "party preference" to "party affiliation," interjecting political party influence back into open primaries.

While this change appears to be innocuous, it destroys several crucial reforms enacted by Proposition 14. Candidates who want to run as an Independent would (under AB 1413) have the ballot designation "Preference: withheld by candidate," making them appear untrustworthy to voters. Furthermore, AB 1413 removes the requirement that voter registration cards inform voters of their right to vote for any candidate, regardless of political party, in clear 12 point font. Some smaller changes reflect an almost desperate attempt to inject political parties back into the primary system, by simply adding the word "partisan" before every "primary election" in the election code.

AB 1413 is by no means an attempt to simply update California's election code. It is a clear attempt by political parties to undermine one of the most important electoral reforms in the past 25 years and maintain the political parties' stranglehold on elections in California.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read