California residents sue Taco Bell for false advertising

image
Chris HinyubChris Hinyub
Published: 28 Jan, 2011
1 min read

A lawsuit filed in federal court in the Central District of California alleges that Taco Bell is falsely advertising its products. The class action suit filed by an Alabama law firm holds that tested samples of the “meat mixture” used by the fast food company for its menu contained very little actual meat.  According to the legal complaint, what Taco Bell is passing off as “seasoned ground beef” or “seasoned beef” is made up of mostly binders and extenders, amongst other savory things such as soy lecithin, wheat, oats, maltodrextrin, modified corn starch and anti-dusting agents.

 

In fact, the complaint alleges that the meat product doesn't even meet the modest minimum requirements set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be called “beef.” Dee Miles for the Montgomery firm Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles said samples that attorneys had tested contained less than 35 percent beef.

 

Rob Poetsch, spokesman for the Irvine-based company, denied that Taco Bell was engaged in false advertising. He told CBS local news in San Francisco, “Taco Bell prides itself on serving high quality Mexican inspired food with great value. We’re happy that the millions of customers we serve every week agree.” He added that Taco Bell would “vigorously defend the suit.”

 

Lawsuits against eateries are often viewed as frivolous or ineffectual, but this particular one exudes a different nature. Class action participants – some of whom are California residents and all of whom are Taco Bell customers – are not seeking monetary damages. The plaintiffs are only asking the court to order Taco Bell to advertise honestly.

 

IVP Donate

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read