CNN and Tea Party Express to host GOP presidential debate in 2011

image
Wes MessamoreWes Messamore
Published: 18 Dec, 2010
3 min read

With Republicans anxious to find a leader who can unify their party and mount a successful challenge to President Obama for the White House, CNN and the Tea Party Express are teaming up to host a "Tea Party debate" next year during Labor Day week.

The Sacramento-based political action committee was founded in the summer of 2009 by Sal Russo and Howard Kaloogian, two Californians with major connections in the Republican Party. Russo worked as an aide to Ronald Reagan during his tenure as governor of California and Kaloogian is a former California state legislator and a leading force behind the successful 2003 recall of Governor Gray Davis.

The Tea Party Express gained notoriety for organizing bus trips of Tea Party activists across the country, stopping in major U.S. cities for rallies in favor of limiting the size, role, and influence of the Federal government, while channeling outrage against bailouts of private businesses and the exploding national debt.  Since then, the Tea Party Express has been instrumental in successfully advancing "Tea Party candidates" in Republican primaries over several establishment favorites throughout the nation.

Now, in partnership with CNN, the Tea Party Express will be hosting a presidential debate for Republican primary candidates in 2011, both organizations announced Friday. CNN Political Director, Sam Feist said:

"The Tea Party movement is a fascinating, diverse, grassroots force that already has drastically changed the country's political landscape. Undecided voters turn to CNN to educate themselves during election cycles, so it is a natural fit for CNN to provide a platform for the diverse perspectives within the Republican Party, including those of the Tea Party."

The Tea Party debate will place specific emphasis on "government spending, lower taxes, and shrinking the deficit." Tea Party Express Chairman Amy Kremer told CNN:

"We want to hear what their ideas are - what their thoughts are - on turning this economy back around and getting us on a sound economic footing, paying down some of our deficit, getting a balanced budget, and reining in the spending."

But for the Tea Party debate to truly be successful at educating voters about prospective GOP nominees, it must delve deeper than asking candidates about their thoughts and ideas. Moderators in the Tea Party debate should ask candidates hard questions about their actual records in government.

IVP Donate

Many of the likely candidates for the nomination have been governors. Did the state's budget grow during their tenure? Why? Those who have held legislative office should also be called to account for votes on deficit-expanding budgets and other large appropriations. Many likely candidates also reluctantly supported the TARP bailouts as a necessary evil in the Fall of 2008. They should be asked to explain themselves to a public that overwhelmingly opposed the TARP bill.

On the campaign trail, politicians always say what voters want to hear, but upon taking office, they frequently do the opposite. A truly rigorous debate and selection process for political office will require the media and electorate not to take politicians at their word, but to examine their actions. No real change in American electoral politics will ever happen until voters learn to ignore the personalities of candidates and start looking at their policies.

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read