U.S. supports world's most prolific funder of terrorism

image
Published: 06 Dec, 2010
1 min read

While national security hawks on both sides of the aisle vociferously condemn Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, they continue to remain mum on U.S. support of Saudi Arabia.  This is despite the fact that several cables revealed U.S. concern over Saudi Arabia's illict financial support of Islamic extremists, as well as Iraq's fear that Saudi Arabia is destablizing the nation by funding a resurgent Al-Qaeda and other Sunni-related causes.  Yet, there is little outcry from hawkish Democrats or tough-talking Republicans.

Instead, the U.S. inks a $60 billion weapons deal with the oil rich nation, the Saudi King is allowed to enter the US for medical tests, and our highest political leaders publicly praise the Saudis as staunch allies in the 'War on Terror'.  This is the same nation that many claim brutally oppresses Christianity and stifles gender equality.  And, it was home to 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers. 

As a result, I would argue that Saudi Arabia, not Julian Assange, is the bigger threat to US national security.  U.S. support of a nation that funds dangerous terrorists and endangers US troops, as well as represents the antithesis of democracy, religious freedom, and gender equality should be viewed as the more glaring culprit.

So, while righteous indignation builds over the "treasonous" activities of Julian Assange, let's not forget that the U.S. provides military, political, and economic support to an oppressive, terror-funding dictatorship.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read