Bad economy forces Los Angeles City Council to be selective in its boycott of Arizona businesses

image
Published: 14 May, 2010
Updated: 13 Oct, 2022
3 min read

Passing by a 13-1 vote, the Los Angeles City Council’s ban on Arizona’s businesses seems to be selective in nature, affecting only some business sectors.



One of the charges hurled at the new immigration law is that it is racist in nature, which was a concern voiced by many Hispanics almost right after its passage.  The Los Angeles City Council’s view is that what it is doing is a noble action on behalf of fighting racism.



"As an American, I cannot go to Arizona today without a passport. If I come across an officer who's having a bad day and feels that the picture on my ID is not me, I can be … deported, no questions asked. That is not American," said Ed Reyes, a Los Angeles councilman who has been very vocal about the new law. 


Racism charges aside, however, boycotting the new law will do more than financially hurt many in the Arizona Hispanic community.  The already struggling job market within the city government sector of Los Angeles is also likely to take a hit.  Industries that are a big part of the California economy are just as likely to lose revenue as well, according to the Los Angeles Times.



Two industries that seem to receive special attention from city officials are the Port of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles International Airport.  According to the LA Times, officials from these two industries are uncertain of the boycott’s effect and are awaiting a pending review from boards that oversee the port, airport, and city utilities.



Concerning how much money is estimated to be lost in these particular industries, the numbers vary.  From contracts that Los Angeles has with two Arizona-based airlines, US Airways and Mesa Air, The Times reports that LAX receives $22 million dollars in revenue.



Pertaining to revenue generated at the Port of Los Angeles, CNN reports that the Harbor Department has $26 million in contracts with Arizona and has come out in opposition to the resolution.

That Los Angeles’ boycott is a very targeted one is all the more highlighted by the resolution’s prohibitions.  According to the resolution, travel by city officials is prohibited “unless special circumstances can be demonstrated to the Council that the failure to authorize such travel would seriously harm City interests.”  The resolution also directs city departments to “refrain from entering into any new or amended contracts to purchase goods or services from any company that is headquartered in Arizona.”



At the same time, the language of the resolution is such that it will only refrain from those new contracts if there is “no significant additional cost to the City.”  While city council members are asserting that they stand against the law based on principle, their conviction does not rest on principle alone.

IVP Donate



In the resolute moves the council makes, they will take into account the economic interests of the city.  Given the close business relationship that Arizona and Los Angeles have in common, council members might find it a little more cumbersome than they thought to carry out the boycott.

Latest articles

Crowd in Time Square.
NYC Exit Survey: 96% of Voters Understood Their Ranked Choice Ballots
An exit poll conducted by SurveyUSA on behalf of the nonprofit better elections group FairVote finds that ranked choice voting (RCV) continues to be supported by a vast majority of voters who find it simple, fair, and easy to use. The findings come in the wake of the city’s third use of RCV in its June 2025 primary elections....
01 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read