logo

Has swine flu lived up to the hype?

image
Created: 03 January, 2010
Updated: 13 October, 2022
3 min read

A Harvard University study suggests that the severity of H1N1 was oversold to the public.  It is unclear how H1N1 will affect public health over the coming months, but thus far, it has proven far less deadly than original predictions by the medical, pharmaceutical, and government communities.  In the beginning of the outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the pandemic alert to its highest level, and warned of a high potential for a worldwide pandemic, while the CDC predicted that as many as 90,000 could die in the US as a result of H1N1.  However, only about 10,000 Americans died from swine flu complications in 2009.  According to the CDC's own statistics, about 36,000 Americans die from regular influenza each year.  In Great Britain, health officials predicted as many as 65,000 swine flu deaths in a worst case scenario, but have drastically revised this prediction to 1,000. Typically, about 4,000 to 8,000 Britons die each year from influenza.  

Currently, the CDC is reporting that H1N1 flu activity may have peaked in October, a month in which only about 10-15% of the US Government's promised 120 million vaccines were in circulation mid-month, and that flu activity is steadily dropping nationwide. Despite these medical statistics, the US Government, scientific community, pharmaceutical industry, and much of the media are continuing to warn the public of another potentially, deadly wave and to push vaccination.  

In Canada and Finland, for example, the response has been far different.  In Canada, a top medical official has declared H1N1 to be a 'dud' pandemic and questioned his nation's $1.5 billion investment in vaccines, drugs, and specialized equipment.  Dr. Richard Schabas, the chief medical officer in two counties in eastern Ontario, stated, "It's really not causing- and is not going to cause and nowhere near has caused- significant levels of illness or death."  He went on to say, "But governments moved ahead regardless. They ramped up their response, spent a huge amount of money on vaccines and other things...for what has ultimately turned out to be, from a pandemic perspective, a dud."  In Finland, the National Institute for Health and Welfare actually removed swine flu from its official list of dangerous diseases back in July.

While all human deaths are devastating and tragic, judged purely by the accumulated medical data, the swine flu has proven extremely mild.  Numerous predictions have been blatantly falsified, and despite a well-coordinated marketing campaign and huge monetary investment by the US Government, H1N1 has come nowhere close to being a pandemic, an outcome that seems to mirror the unjustified panic which was stoked back during the 1976 swine flu "outbreak".

This should cause us to pause, take a step back, and conduct an objective evaluation.  While many would argue that the scientific community, US Government, and worldwide organizations acted in good faith based on the best available data, the fact remains that the so-called pandemic is in fact, not a pandemic at all.  Much like the swine flu hysteria of 1976, the swine flu hysteria of 2009 failed to live up to the hype.  The scientific community was wrong.  The WHO was wrong.  The US Government, as well as state governments such as California, were wrong.  And not to be overlooked, the pharmaceutical industry was wrong, though it raked in huge profits during a severe recession.  

2010 is a new year for another round of testing, but if 1976 and 2009 have taught us anything, it is highly likely that the swine flu will prove relatively mild again this year.  And if it is, it will provide independent-minded voters with yet another opportunity to hold the consensus of scientists, governments, and pharmaceutical companies accountable. Independent voters are encouraged to analyze all aspects of H1N1 and apply a similar method of objective analysis to other critical issues such as climate change, health care reform, government stimulus packages, financial rescues, and national security threats.  

 

 

 

IVP Existence Banner

 

 

 

 

 

Latest articles

votes
Wyoming Purges Nearly 30% of Its Voters from Registration Rolls
It is not uncommon for a state to clean out its voter rolls every couple of years -- especially to r...
27 March, 2024
-
1 min read
ballot box
The Next Big Win in Better Election Reform Could Come Where Voters Least Expect
Idaho isn't a state that gets much attention when people talk about politics in the US. However, this could change in 2024 if Idahoans for Open Primaries and their allies are successful with their proposed initiative....
21 March, 2024
-
3 min read
Courts
Why Do We Accept Partisanship in Judicial Elections?
The AP headline reads, "Ohio primary: Open seat on state supreme court could flip partisan control." This immediately should raise a red flag for voters, and not because of who may benefit but over a question too often ignored....
19 March, 2024
-
9 min read
Nick Troiano
Virtual Discussion: The Primary Solution with Unite America's Nick Troiano
In the latest virtual discussion from Open Primaries, the group's president, John Opdycke, sat down ...
19 March, 2024
-
1 min read
Sinema
Sinema's Exit Could Be Bad News for Democrats -- Here's Why
To many, the 2024 presidential primary has been like the movie Titanic - overly long and ending in a disaster we all saw coming from the start. After months of campaigning and five televised primary debates, Americans are now faced with a rematch between two candidates polling shows a majority of them didn’t want....
19 March, 2024
-
7 min read