They're not fooling anyone

image
Published: 23 Dec, 2009
2 min read

According to a California-based think tank, politicians continue to skirt campaign finance laws to raise millions of dollars.  According to LA's Center for Governmental Studies, legal defense funds, inaugural and leadership committees, donations to favored charities, political party contributions and reimbursed travel expenses are among the "tricks of the trade" used to subvert campaign finance regulations.  

For example, Governor Schwarzenegger, the most prolific fundraiser in state history, raked in $125 million over a four year period.  In just the first six months of 2009, Schwarzenegger raised $6.5 million despite donations to governors being limited to $25,900 per election cycle. The money was directed to Schwarzenegger's 'California Dream Team', an all-purpose political fund that he has occasionally utilized to fund ballot measures.  

However, Schwarzenegger spokesman, Adam Mendelsohn defended Schwarzenegger, stating that the Governor has repeatedly called for campaign finance reform and supports AB 583, which will appear on the 2010 ballot and would create public financing for the office of Secretary of State by 2011.  However, despite the Governor's pleas, the state has done virtually nothing to contain skyrocketing campaign contributions.

A similar trend is seen nationwide.  Campaign finance laws are littered with legal loopholes, and politicians are vigorously exploiting them. The Center for Governmental Studies is offering a number of potential solutions to reign in the overt abuse and institute greater accountability.  It is proposing a new model in which money that candidates or elected officials receive is strictly for a political purpose. Under such a model, politicians would be required to disclose any contributions of more than $100 and would be prohibited from using any contributions for personal purposes.  In addition, legal defense funds would be treated as a separate issue, and travel reimbursement would be more substantially limited.

CAIVP is also working hard to develop a more transparent campaign finance model.  Money has come to dominate politics, and as a result, politicians have sacrificed service, integrity, and performance for special interest favors.  At CAIVP, we'd like to hear your thoughts, concerns, and feedback on how to revamp California's campaign finance laws.  Please click here to offer your input. 

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read