We Didn't Have a Budget, But They Had Ideas!

We Didn't Have a Budget, But They Had Ideas!
Published: 07 Apr, 2009
3 min read

True, California did not have a cohesive budget for months. Even while the governor struggled to force cohesion, even mandating that state employees take a proverbial during the work week. But state legislators didn't let that keep them from promoting... other legislation. From December 2008 through February 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger appeared to be cajoling legislators into doing their jobs, and it certainly appeared that his work was like pulling teeth.

Member of the State Senate and Assembly did not come to a budgetary agreement until February 2009, but before then, a number of less than hard-hitting amendments were proposed, including the State Senate's "Relative to Irish American Heritage Month" proclamation, and the "Relative to Greek Independence Day."

Give the legislators a hand: despite incredible odds, they kept open minds... or something like that. On February 19, 2009, state representatives agreed to a statewide budget, and plan to bring under control the $42 billion budget.

S.C.R. No. 17-C was introduced on December 17, 2008. On February 4, it received analysis on theSenate floor, at which time it was "resolved by the Senate of the State of California" that March 25, 2009 would be recognized as Greek Independence Day. In December, Representative Alquist was thinking four months ahead to a March celebration, though a majority of legislators still could not put it upon themselves to also pen a budget.

In the Assembly, on January 7, Assembly Member Hayashi introduced ACR 9, a resolution to celebrate January 13, 2009 as Korean-American Day (one month and twelve days before the budget's passage). There was no noted opposition on the Assembly or State Senate floors. Bill ACR No. 20, pertaining to Black History Month, was introduced on February 11 (eight days before the budget's passing). Bill AB 64 was introduced on December 9, 2008 (two months and 10 days before the budget's passage), which dealt with renewable energy topics. (Funny thing is, it's hard to invest extra money in renewable energy projects, when there isn't a budget to spend, eh?) AB 87 was introduced in the Assembly on January 5, 2009 (one month and 14 days before the budget's passage), dealing with "single-use carryout bags," promoting recycling alternatives and information on the "environmental effects" of said bags.

Ok, and even though this one was introduced right after the budget was passed (eight days later, on February 27), it's still a keeper: Senate Bill S.B. No. 750, pertaining to "Exotic animals: kangaroos" and prohibiting the "importation for commercial purposes inapplicable to the dead body of any kangaroo. It would delete the exception and the January 1, 2011, termination date" of the current law, which "generally provides that it is a crime to import for commercial purposes, possess with intent to sell, or sell any part or product of the dead body of a kangaroo, subject to specified misdemeanor penalties for each violation. However, until January 1, 2011, exception is made for kangaroos that may be harvested lawfully under Australian national and state law, the federal Endangered Species Act of 1971, and applicable international conventions, under specified conditions." YES!

Does anyone else get the impression that procrastination played a huge part in the budget fiasco? I thought the state leaders were elected to do the work others didn't want to do...

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read