Nixon Admitted Weed Wasn’t Dangerous, But Killed It to Crush Political Dissent

Jail cell.
Photo by Grant Durr on Unsplash
Published: 09 Jul, 2025
2 min read

Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: A History (Part Two)

For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades.

This seven-part series chronicles the milestones, backlash, and unintended consequences that have shaped the war on cannabis from the 1960s to the present day.

Part One: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political

 


On June 17, 1971, President Richard Nixon addressed the nation and formally launched what came to be known as the War on Drugs, calling drug abuse “public enemy number one” in America. 

A year earlier, President Nixon signed the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, the law that created the modern drug scheduling system and reinstated federal cannabis prohibition. Cannabis was placed in Schedule I — the most restrictive category — 9on a supposedly “temporary” basis, pending further study.

It was a policy shift that would reshape American law enforcement, our courts, and those incarcerated in our prisons for generations.

Nixon’s real feelings about cannabis were captured on his secret White House recording system. Still, they went largely unnoticed until 2024, when a cannabis industry lobbyist in Minnesota discovered them while reviewing hours of tapes. The New York Times broke the story.

IVP Donate

In a March 1973 White House meeting, he admitted that cannabis was “not particularly dangerous” and expressed discomfort with the extreme punishments people were receiving for possession. 

Nixon even pointed to a recent case involving a 30-year sentence, calling it “ridiculous,” and said, “penalties should be commensurate with the crime.” 

On cannabis, he confessed, “Let me tell you, I know nothing about marijuana. I know that it’s not particularly dangerous, and most of the kids are for legalizing it. But on the other hand, it’s the wrong signal at this time.” 

Despite his private reservations, Nixon maintained a hard public line. “I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana,” he said in a 1971 Oval Office recording. 

Nixon appointed nine of the thirteen members of the commission he tasked with reviewing cannabis. Nixon’s own commission ultimately concluded that cannabis “did not constitute a major threat to public health.” It found no compelling evidence that marijuana use led to harder drugs or caused violence and instead recommended that possession be decriminalized. The panel urged a shift toward “persuasion rather than prosecution.” 

President Nixon ignored the recommendation and kept cannabis classified as a Schedule I substance.

“It reinforces Nixon as a Machiavellian political operative,” historian Douglas Brinkley later said. “He dehumanized drug users because it was in his political interest to do so.”

 

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Check Out Part 3 of this series, "The Seventies: High Times with Jimmy Carter and Jerry Brown."

In this article

You Might Also Like

Fox News channel
Fox News And Its Very Dishonest Cannabis DUI Story
A recent Fox News segment about 106 drivers with THC in their systems who died in car crashes shows how media networks package limited research findings into sensationalized news that seeks to influence political debate. At a key moment when President Donald J. Trump is weighing a decision to use his executive power to reschedule cannabis and combat illegal drug cartels, the network's reporting on a Wright State University study about THC and traffic fatalities scares viewers by misrepresenting the scope and key findings. ...
10 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
Cannabis and Trump
Trump Shares Pro-Cannabis Video From Longtime Friend, Heightening Suspense Over Cannabis Rescheduling
On September 28, President Donald Trump posted a Truth Social video praising CBD as a “game-changer” for seniors....
30 Sep, 2025
-
4 min read
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read