Court Grants Johnson, Stein Extension in Anti-Trust Case Against Debate Commission
Author: Richard Winger
Created: 27 Nov, 2017
●
Updated: 21 Nov, 2022●
1 min read
Gary Johnson and Jill Stein still plan to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Johnson v. Commission on Presidential Debates, their case using federal anti-trust law to attack the exclusionary policy of the Commission on Presidential Debates. Their cert petition was originally due at the end of November, but the Court has granted an extension to file. The cert petition is now due December 27.
Editor's note: This update originally published on Ballot Access News, and has been republished on IVN with permission from the author.
Latest articles
Over 1 Million Unaffiliated Voters Left Out of NYC Primaries, CFB Report Finds
New York City has a massive voter suppression problem. A new report from the NYC Campaign Finance Board (CFB) found that 1-in-5 voters (21.1%) in the city are registered unaffiliated and are excluded from taxpayer-funded primary elections....
30 Apr, 2025
-
5 min read
10 Members of US Congress and Senate Who Don’t Follow Party Marching Orders
Independence means different things to different people. For us, it means more than rejecting party lines; it means thinking for yourself, being accountable to principles and constituents, and resisting the pressures of partisan orthodoxy....
30 Apr, 2025
-
6 min read
In 3 States, Partisans Pick the Secretary of State Without Voter or Executive Input
In 47 US states, the secretary of state is a recognized statewide office, and in most of those states, voters get to decide who holds it. But in three 3 states — Maine, Tennessee, and New Hampshire — the legislature holds that power exclusively....
29 Apr, 2025
-
7 min read